Subj : Re: Here's another one
To   : richardw
From : Deuce
Date : Wed Sep 07 2005 11:56 am

  Re: Re: Here's another one
  By: richardw to The Lizard Master on Wed Sep 07 2005 10:30:00

 >  >  > So... are you saying he didn't lie under oath?
 >  >
 >  > I'm saying he was tried and found not guilty.  She asked why he was so
 >  > different and why the laws not apply to him.
 > 
 > Perfectly good question IMO.  He was obviously guilty of perjury.

You may be interested in looking up the number of perjury trials that ever take
place.

Of course, almost everyone who is found guilty is ALSO guilty of perjury. 
Given how oten perjury isn't prosecuted (especially against the person who was
on trial) I would say the law applied just as much as to everyone else.

---
 þ Synchronet þ ``Penguins make tasty snacks''

.