Subj : Re: She continues to conf
To   : The Lizard Master
From : sn0w0wl
Date : Wed Sep 07 2005 12:46 am

The Lizard Master wrote:
> Let's say a Democrat is in office.  He decides he wants to attack Canada
> because they may have WMD's, but we find later they don't.  You're saying that
> you wouldn't make a questioning statement such as, "I was taught that America
> was good, that America was just."  etc.  I agree with her statements above. I
> love America very much, and I fly my flag. 

No...I wouldn't make that statement regardless of whether the pres is 
rep, dem or whatever..I would feel about the issue the same as I do 
now...I support all the reasons for going, not just a few handpicked 
ones...and until I see evidence beyond a reasonable doubt then I will 
respect the office and stand behind the president....makes no difference 
what party he belongs to....if it were proven that all the reasons were 
based on lies then the pres and anyone else involved should be held 
accountable but I *still* would not make the statement because it's not 
my country that's was in the wrong...and, being the great country that 
we are, we would find a way to make it right...

besides...I was referring to the "This country isn't worth dying for" 
statement that preceding the one you quoted...

> 
> Theodore Roosevelt said, "To announce that there must be no criticism of the
> President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not
> only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American
> public. "

well, whoopee for teddy...she and anyone else has every right to 
criticize whomever they choose, to a point...but that doesn't mean that 
every criticism that's spoken is the gospel truth or even morally just 
and above scrutiny and criticism itself...

-- 
"You drink, you get laid and then you die." ~~Words of wisdom from Papa 
Titus to his son Chris~~

---
 þ Synchronet þ theroughnecks.net - you know you want it

.