Subj : Re: Here's another one To : Finnigann From : sn0w0wl Date : Sat Sep 03 2005 12:01 am Finnigann wrote: > > You would have the tiniest bit of credibility if you were there. Credibility for what? my opinion? > > How can you say that it's not about her son any more? I can say that it's my *opinion* that it's not about her son anymore...I based this on things that she, herself, has said...how can you say that it is still about her son? It's your opinion that it is...only one person knows for sure and that is Cindy Sheehan.... > How can you know the pain she is feeling. Does your loyalty to that > idiot bush demand you make such statments? I have no idea what she is feeling....I sympathize with her loss as much as I can...I have a son too and I don't even wanna think about what it would be like to lose him...pain and grief can cause people to do things they wouldn't normally do... As for my loyalty to W...I am loyal to my president *regardless* of who is doing the job...as I've stated in another post, I couldn't (and still can't) stand Clinton but I was still loyal to him as the president...if all this was happening under Clinton's watch then I would be here supporting him (as the commander-in-chief) and I would *still* be expressing the exact same opinions with regard to Cindy Sheehan.... > sn> I also question some of her comments, such as the ones in the links... > > > You can question HER comments but 'w's lying is ok now that we're in the > hit!!! I've questioned some of the things that W has done as well....I question your comments, Tracker's comments, everyone's comments until I can find out the basis for them and form my own opinion....I even question my own opinions at times whether it be from lack of knowledge or whatever the reason...I question and research lots of things from all sides...but I'm not going to defend myself to you or anyone else...my comments on any subject are my opinions and whoever reads them can take or leave them...makes no difference to me.... > > sn> it just makes me remember when Clinton was 'under fire' from every > sn> direction...there were people who felt (and probably still feel) about > sn> Clinton the way some people feel about W...doesn't matter whether what > > Not in the least. Did someone tell you we were in Erope for some reason other > than helping those people? Did someone tell you that we were about to be nuked? > Did anyone mis-represent that war to you? Sorry if I'm having a blonde moment but what are you refering to? When I was speaking about Clinton being 'under fire' I was referring to the desire by some on the right to take him down no matter what...did I miss something inbetween scandals? > > And you think that 'w' is like any other preident. That turd tosser couldn't > clean Lowinski's toilet. That's good cause he shouldn't be...just like Clinton shouldn't have been cleaning her c*** with a cigar.... > > sn> they think is right or wrong as long as they can get rid of him, even > sn> if they have to lie, cheat, steal or kill, doesn't matter...happened to > sn> Clinton and it's happening to W as well...blatant mis-deeds (regardless > > Clinton lied about a blow job... 'w' lied about a war. Clinton lied under oath...I could care less what he lied about...the fact that he lied under oath means that he should be in prison...if you or I had lied under oath that's exactly where we'd be....why is he different? do the laws not apply to him? As far as W goes...I'm sure time will tell whether he actually lied or not...the only evidence I've hear of his lying is that one memo...hell, Clinton shot his wad on Monica's dress and people *still* didn't believe he was lying about his affair....yes, I realize that they are two totally different situations...point is, it took time to find out that Clinton was lying so I'm willing to keep an open mind until I see more evidence than one memo... > > sn> of who commits them) should be pursued but all the digging around in > sn> every little tiny crevice in the hopes of finding 'something' is > sn> ridiculous...I felt that way while it was happening to Clinton (though > sn> I still feel that he should be rotting in a prison cell somewhere for > sn> perjury) and I feel that way while it happens to W until I see concrete > sn> evidence... > > > The evidense has been reported memos revealed. Peoples safety have been > sacrificed because of that texas POS (although not original to texas) > > Just what will it take to prove to you that 'w' hasn't got a clue about > leadership. Why do you care? As far as you're concerned I'm just another idiot Republican who is too stupid to see what's really going on....at least that's how you come across.... > > He just saw an opportunity to shift more money to the rich, and he took it. Good...glad to see that 'redistribution of wealth' theory works both ways... > > I hope you don't have anyone in harms way in Iraq. and I hope you never know > the pain from such a loss. Thank you for your concern....fortunately my son's not old enough to go (he's only 10) and neither of my brothers are there...both wanted to be in the military though...my oldest wanted to join the Air Force but his eyesight wasn't good enough...my middle brother joined the Marines but has to get a medical discharge due to a previous back injury...had he been able to stay in he would probably be there right now...if he had gone over I would be extremely proud of him and had he died I would like to think that I would honor his memory by being proud of the fact that he had died for what he believed was right...honestly though I can't say how I'd feel.... -- "You drink, you get laid and then you die." ~~Words of wisdom from Papa Titus to his son Chris~~ --- þ Synchronet þ theroughnecks.net - you know you want it .