Subj : Re: 4BATFAQ Update
To   : Jasen.Betts@xspamp42.f531.n640.z3.f
From : Rolf Jentsch
Date : Thu Jan 31 2002 05:34 am

From: email@rolfjentsch.de (Rolf Jentsch)

Jasen.Betts@xspamp42.f531.n640.z3.fidonet.org meinte am 30.01.02 zum Thema "Re: 
4BATFAQ Update":

O>> IMO, some 4DOS users have a tendency to be fanatical about 4DOS and
O>> have a big problem with non 4DOS users and . I don't think this
O>> gives a good impression, especially to potential 4DOS users.
> Gotta agree there.

I disagree with respect. I use 4dos since 4.0 (ndos in fact). Other self 
written non commercial command interpreters as well. 4dos is ok. It is able to 
produce solutions for the most things I like it to do easier than others I 
tried as well. Most of all it is able to produce a readable code. But there are 
plenty others that work well too, that I perhaps just have not tried yet.

I do think it is a good product and can only suggest it to others that break 
their thumbs by twisted "goto" solution with command.com f.e. by now. If they 
do not want it - well - their decision. I have no benefit from other people 
using 4dos.

Nevertheless I don't have any missionaring ambitions.

So it might be agood idea not to cut all wool with the same pair of scissors 
(if that translates)


- *wbr* Rolf -

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-2
 * Origin: Mach2 Systems (1:342/3)

.