發信人: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=A4=A4=B0=EA=A6=40=B2=A3=C4=D2=B8U=B7=B3=B8U=B7=B3=B8U=B8U=B7=B3 ()
日期: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 17:00:22 +0800
標題: Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=A7=F5=DFN=AEp=A1G=B9L=B5=DB=A5x=BFW=AA=BA=A5=CD=AC=A1=A4=CF
信群: tw.bbs.soc.politics,hk.politics,alt.chinese.text.big5    看板: 
來源: <3E4375A6.1366B7E9@hotmail.com>:798298, n218103176118.netvigator.com
組織: IMS Netvigator

Stop the contvesrsy la ! Everybody can live without these soap-opera dispute ?
Who cares if you live under the roof of ROC or PRC or SAR if you enjoyed a
cherishable life ?



Droup of mainland Chinese people went to Taiwan and made up "中

> 華民國憲法",
> and attempted to seperate it from it's motherland "CHINA".
> The question is at that time, Taiwan was already independent or part of
> China.
>
> If former, any evidence?
>
> If latter, why not Taipei people can one day made up their new constitution
> and request seperate from Taiwan.
>
> >
> >
> > >can one day the people live in your building forming a government vote
> for
> > >the future of your owning building?
> > >
> > >Years ago, a group of Chinese went to Taiwan(part of China) and formed a
> > >local government and request to
> > >vote for the future of Taiwan.  Sounds funny.
> >
> > Nothing funny at all.  中華民國憲法 allows such legislation and
> > there is a Central Government by the Constitution, *not* local
> > government.
>
> I think it quite depends on the validity of 中華民國憲法.
> If today Taipei people made up a new constitution of Taipei, you must say
> that it is NOT valid because of 中華民國憲法.
>
> But the day "those Chinese people who went to Taiwan years ago" made up 中華
> 民國憲法, was it valid?

.