發信人: chen@getsparc202.uni-paderborn.de (Nan-Shan Chen)
日期: 24 Dec 2002 15:28:19 +0100
標題: Re: 「建構式數學」立大功：台灣學生滿分者，佔全球一半！
信群: tw.bbs.soc.politics,hk.politics,alt.chinese.text.big5    看板: 
來源: <au9qu3$5j7@getsparc202.uni-paderborn.de>:784999, getsparc202.uni-paderborn.de
組織: Universitaet Paderborn, Germany

justice.bbs@bbs.cis.nctu.edu.tw (大法官) writes:

>           建構式思考的簡單舉例

>把「台灣學生滿分者，佔全球一半」跟「建構式數學立大功」
>連接起來，就是一種建構式的思考。

I agree with jkx and have to follow-up even in English, sorry.
I don't even know if this would appear in groups other than
*.big5.

(snip)


>【 在 st0360n.bbs@bbs.hs.ntnu.edu.tw (發誓我要努力 >"<) 的大作中提到:
>】
>: 今天台灣的學術界這麼脆弱,
>: 我告訴你們,
>: 有沒有搞錯...領導教育改革的全部都是學文科的...
>: 在這邊大放厥詞的也都是文科的人,
>: 這樣你們用文科的角度去討論理科的東西做什麼?
>: 搞錯了吧...學過高等微積分的請站出來...

Sorry, IMHO, these are not only irrelevant arguments
but also incorrect or insufficient perceptions of

    what science is.

Quite on the contrary, I've seen/read many "文科的人"
who are far more developed in scientific method than
those who claim to have learned some math.

A very good example is

   jkx.

(Well, I suppose he is considered to be a "文科的人".)

In fact, he has been teaching all of us about mathematical
mathods HERE. But my claim would be even stronger than that:

   Imitating his methods will directly elevate
   our science (in its status quo) holistically.

I believe jkx himself would understand perfectly what
I'm talking about. For those who do not see this at all,
the first step would be to

   review all of his (jkx) posts and consider
   in the mean while what real scientific/mathematical
   activities and disciplines are. 

And I'll give detailed argumentation upon questioning,
but in English.  Sorry for that inconvenience.

Please don't get me wrong. I do not have the slightest
idea who and what jkx is.  But that does not matter at
all. The deed, the thought and the words do matter.

(snip)

Rudi

PS. Would anyone please relay this in case it does not
appear in other groups than alt.*.big5.


-- 
Please remove the string  s p a r c 2 0 2  to mail me.

.