發信人: Nobody@Utopia.tw (=?big5?B?tUymV6bRpGw=?=)
日期: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 08:37:03 +0800
標題: Re: 知悉不等於知情
信群: tw.bbs.soc.politics,hk.politics,alt.chinese.text.big5    看板: 
來源: <3C9FC2AF.FE604BCA@Utopia.tw>:643904, a529-1.fl.nthu.edu.tw
組織: =?big5?B?v7vBpqZAqU2w6g==?=


哇，大新聞。大林改用本名了




"林毓霖" wrote:
> 
> 這位大哥！小弟英文不佳，能否儘量用土話以餉其他人眾。
> 
> "大法官" <judge@court.com> 撰寫於郵件新聞:3c9eec3a.22193943@168.95.195.16...
> > On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 08:27:26 GMT, stevec@hal-pc.org (stevec) wrote:
> >
> > >Don't blame everything on KMT during the Chiangs.   How many
> > >millionare prime ministers, cabinet members do you know during their
> > >reign ?        How many owned large mansions, Mercedez, BMW s. ?
> > >
> > >Most of their cabinet is made of professional technocrats.
> > >Engineers ,Economists,         They lived on their civil servant
> > >salery.   Many live in poverty today, living on a meager pension.
> >
> >
> > 數以千億計的國民黨黨產（全世界最有錢的政黨）
> > 連戰的億兆家財（連父在蔣家統治初期還是個破產者）
> > 兩大報在壟斷市場四十年下蔚為今日「文化大財團」的經過
> >
> > Please defend aboves for them if you can.  Or do you truly believe
> > these are just the production of Lee's reign?
> >
> > Please name those "many(cabinet members) live in poverty today"?
> > Don't just generalize.
> >
> >
> > >The corruption of the KMT started with Lee bringing in the domestic
> > >business clans to help his power struggle.    He opened the spigot of
> > >black money.    This is widely known fact, often reported by foreign
> > >newsmedia,   You are apparently too biased to recognize it.
> >
> >
> > Who had been so eulogized for 勤政愛民、全省三百多個鄉鎮走透透 and
> > ended up with a deficit from 3,000億 sky-rocketing to 8,000億？
> >
> > 宋楚瑜。
> >
> > Who was the rich benefactor of the famous 3628萬 donated to 伍澤元？
> >
> > 連戰。
> >
> > Anyone wishes to write a bestseller on the subject 「李登輝黑金史」
> > better start with these two guys for one had self-dubbed as 情同父子
> > to Lee and one had been Lee's chosen political heir.
> >
> > Both their nowaday clans（國親兩黨）must be eager to expose Lee's
> > "crimes" and both must be able to produce mountainous evidences and
> > witnesses concerning how "the spigot of black money" were operated,
> > the first hand insider information.  Or else who can?
> >
> > Why we don't see anything happen here?  What are they afraid of?
> >
> > Believe me, I'm even more eager than you to see a book like this, a
> > purge of history and a total annihilation of the "pan-KMT family"!
> >
> >
> > >Kang  and the rest of DPP like to portray themselves as saints,
> > >pointing fingers at others,      we all know what they did.
> > >Mistresses,  multiple  wives.     They are getting rich as fast as the
> > >KMT.
> > >
> > >You are apparently related  to DPP,  why don't you ask Kang why he
> > >lied about chairing the comitte at the time ?     Why he and his party
> > >initially opposed the Lafatte when price was cheaper than the Korean,
> > >but passed it after multiple price hikes to double the price the
> > >Singaporeans paid.
> >
> >
> > Please define "related to DPP"?
> >
> > Make any accusation to any Green's as you wish but you need
> > to talk outta facts and logic to make sense to people.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Friend of Trend
> >
> > ***************************************************
> > Je chante pour toi.  Oui, rien que pour toi.
> > Toi qui ne sais rien de ces merveilles.
> > ***************************************************
> >
> 
> ---
> 
> Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
> 
> Complaints to news@netfront.net

-- 
無名老子
.