發信人: limax@mail.com (林毓霖)
日期: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 22:00:44 +0800
標題: Re: 知悉不等於知情
信群: tw.bbs.soc.politics,hk.politics,alt.chinese.text.big5    看板: 
來源: <a7nai4$112u$1@menuhin.netfront.net>:643734, 61-218-95-98.hinet-ip.hinet.net
組織: Netfront Broadband

這位大哥！小弟英文不佳，能否儘量用土話以餉其他人眾。

"大法官" <judge@court.com> 撰寫於郵件新聞:3c9eec3a.22193943@168.95.195.16...
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 08:27:26 GMT, stevec@hal-pc.org (stevec) wrote:
>
> >Don't blame everything on KMT during the Chiangs.   How many
> >millionare prime ministers, cabinet members do you know during their
> >reign ?        How many owned large mansions, Mercedez, BMW s. ?
> >
> >Most of their cabinet is made of professional technocrats.
> >Engineers ,Economists,         They lived on their civil servant
> >salery.   Many live in poverty today, living on a meager pension.
>
>
> 數以千億計的國民黨黨產（全世界最有錢的政黨）
> 連戰的億兆家財（連父在蔣家統治初期還是個破產者）
> 兩大報在壟斷市場四十年下蔚為今日「文化大財團」的經過
>
> Please defend aboves for them if you can.  Or do you truly believe
> these are just the production of Lee's reign?
>
> Please name those "many(cabinet members) live in poverty today"?
> Don't just generalize.
>
>
> >The corruption of the KMT started with Lee bringing in the domestic
> >business clans to help his power struggle.    He opened the spigot of
> >black money.    This is widely known fact, often reported by foreign
> >newsmedia,   You are apparently too biased to recognize it.
>
>
> Who had been so eulogized for 勤政愛民、全省三百多個鄉鎮走透透 and
> ended up with a deficit from 3,000億 sky-rocketing to 8,000億？
>
> 宋楚瑜。
>
> Who was the rich benefactor of the famous 3628萬 donated to 伍澤元？
>
> 連戰。
>
> Anyone wishes to write a bestseller on the subject 「李登輝黑金史」
> better start with these two guys for one had self-dubbed as 情同父子
> to Lee and one had been Lee's chosen political heir.
>
> Both their nowaday clans（國親兩黨）must be eager to expose Lee's
> "crimes" and both must be able to produce mountainous evidences and
> witnesses concerning how "the spigot of black money" were operated,
> the first hand insider information.  Or else who can?
>
> Why we don't see anything happen here?  What are they afraid of?
>
> Believe me, I'm even more eager than you to see a book like this, a
> purge of history and a total annihilation of the "pan-KMT family"!
>
>
> >Kang  and the rest of DPP like to portray themselves as saints,
> >pointing fingers at others,      we all know what they did.
> >Mistresses,  multiple  wives.     They are getting rich as fast as the
> >KMT.
> >
> >You are apparently related  to DPP,  why don't you ask Kang why he
> >lied about chairing the comitte at the time ?     Why he and his party
> >initially opposed the Lafatte when price was cheaper than the Korean,
> >but passed it after multiple price hikes to double the price the
> >Singaporeans paid.
>
>
> Please define "related to DPP"?
>
> Make any accusation to any Green's as you wish but you need
> to talk outta facts and logic to make sense to people.
>
>
>
>
> Friend of Trend
>
> ***************************************************
> Je chante pour toi.  Oui, rien que pour toi.
> Toi qui ne sais rien de ces merveilles.
> ***************************************************
>


---
Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
Complaints to news@netfront.net
.