發信人: stevec@hal-pc.org (stevec) 日期: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 01:15:12 GMT 標題: Re: 知悉不等於知情 信群: tw.bbs.soc.politics,hk.politics,alt.chinese.text.big5 看板: 來源: <3c9e71bd.1964507@news.hal-pc.org>:643377, 206.180.128.96.dial-ip.hal-pc.org 組織: Houston Area League of PC Users > >李慶華 & 謝聰敏 did the same trips, self-appointed too. Would you >say, then, that these two gents are also in deep shits and seeking >only to cover themselves up? Hmm. I didn't know they went too. Given the level of corruption in Taiwan and amount of money involved, nothing is impossible. Most Taiwanese politicians are extraordinarily wealthy by world standard. I have nothing against those two. Just think Kang is hiding the truth. He denied he was chairman of that comitte passing the Lafayette purchase is (He was the stand in chairman) He made 180 degree turn . should raise question in anyone's mind. > > > >This is quite irrelevant, if the incident you refered to is 林肯大 >郡事件。DDP had been running 台北縣 for 8 years, and 尤清's staff >(建設局長) had been indicted for this and found guilty together >with his other corrupted doings. > >The lesson taken here is the issue on long term national policy of >水土保持 and 過度開發。And yes, blame Lee for your house toilet >congestion if you like, I reckon your full rights. Apparently a scape goat. Thankyou for refreshing my memory.. I now remember it was a very very timely policy change allowing the permits issue. Of course I don't have the evidence. If it were that easy to get evidence there's be no corruption at all.. I don't have access to old China Times article. But anyone in Taiwan can check it out. Could be very profitable if you write a book on it. The truth is printed, buried in those old newspapers. The corruption may very well involve all factions in Taiwan, DPP included. Why were they silent when the balooned budget passed Legislature ? It was virtual public knowledge the final price doubled from initial reported by Ho when he ordered delaying Korean purchase , look at French instead. They were raising hell everything else the KMT did. The same China Times article also mentioned the Singaporean(not sure, could be someone else) Navy purchased the warships fully armed at half the price Taiwan paid. I was reading it then , thought it was rather strange . someone is stealing. When Kang passed the bill I was very disapointed, I thought till that time Kang and DPP were honest, not corrupt like KMT. How wrong can I be, the DPP is full of millionairs too. Could anyone tell me how Lee Tenghui, a lifetime civil servant, accumulated so much sealth. I know it wasn't inheritance, can't be his salery. Where did he get it? Why are Taiwanese politicians all so rich? (all factions) > > >>On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 08:02:15 GMT, stevec@hal-pc.org (stevec) wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>「億而富建立佣金管道」跟「最後購艦總價(147億法郎)與法方代表敲定」都 >>>>「巧合」地發生在同一天:1990年 7月 4日——這是昨天(2002.3.22)中國時報 >>>>「獨家」才剛剛出爐的報導。這個時間點有官方紀錄可供按覈。 >>>> >>>>所以你說的 "the reported price Ho(郝)proposed was only half what >>>>passed in Legislative Yuan 2 years later." 顯然是個錯誤的記憶。 >>>> >>>>再者,康寧祥果如你懷疑的 deeply involved in this scandal,別說統派媒體 >>>>早把他「撕吃落腹」,根本一開頭就輪不到他來主持拉案和尹案的調查了!而媒 >>>>體上自始全不見任何要求監委「利益迴避」的聲音,所以我想你的 "I believe" >>>>難以成立。 > > >Friend of Trend > >*************************************************** >Je chante pour toi. Oui, rien que pour toi. >Toi qui ne sais rien de ces merveilles. >*************************************************** > .