CLARENCE MALBROUGH Charge: Petty theft with a prior conviction of theft Value of stolen goods: $80.67 (batteries) When Clarence Malbrough walked out of the Payless store in El Cerrito on March 9 with 13 packages of double-A batteries stuffed into his shirt, he was quickly apprehended by a security guard. Police subsequently cited and released him with a court date. The batteries were worth $80.67, and Malbrough freely admitted the crime. It was the last of a number of petty thefts that had kept him behind bars for much of his 48 years. "How did you get yourself into this mess?" he was asked. "Well, I'm a drug addict," he replied simply. "A drug addict for 30 years." In the weeks before his final arrest, he'd been picked up for walking out of stores with Tylenol in one instance, cologne in another. Ironically, his last theft, the batteries, came as Malbrough was making a determined effort to "get back a life" by getting rid of "this monkey on my back" -- heroin. "He had paid a lot to society," said one of his three adult daughters, "and he was finally getting it together. ... He was on the right track." For similar petty thefts in the past, Clarence Malbrough had generally received jail sentences of about 30 days. This time, the mild-mannered, balding grandfather of nine, who had been considered harmless enough to be cited and released, was hauled back to jail when the Contra Costa district attorney's office realized he was subject to a law that had gone into effect just two days before the theft, a law that could keep him in prison for decades. If convicted and sentenced as a "third striker," the 48-year-old Malbrough may be in his 70s before he gets to go to the park again with his daughters and grandchildren. Clarence Malbrough is a family man against all odds. From his earliest years to his final days of freedom -- through addiction and crime and incarceration -- he has maintained strong family ties. He was married to the same woman, also an addict, for 27 years, and in recent years has had a stable home life with a woman friend and her children. He has worked to re-establish family ties with his three daughters -- a hospital receptionist, a security guard and a homemaker -- and his grandchildren, who range in age from 6 months to 15 years. He is also a deeply religious, Bible-quoting man; a gifted singer who once made a gospel tape at San Quentin prison; and an intelligent man who has read widely despite his prematurely terminated high school education. Malbrough's father did not live with the family and, says Clarence's sister, Vivian, "was never any help to us" during their childhood years. But Clarence Malbrough was very close to his mother, Cleophus, a college-educated, disabled teacher who raised him and his brother and sister to be Christians and law-abiding citizens. They were a happy, close-knit family, and his mother had firm standards. The kids always attended church and school activities -- young Clarence was a school crossing guard and won trophies for talent contests -- and they were not allowed to play with kids whose families weren't known to their mother. Malbrough's childhood dreams were the American dream: "Like all kids, I wanted to be somebody -- a doctor, a lawyer, a fireman, policeman. ... We all had those dreams of wanting to be successful. A singer. I wanted to be an entertainer. I wanted to do a lot of things." At one point, a teacher even considered taking the talented youngster to Europe to sing. But those early dreams dissipated soon after his family moved from the supposedly rough but intimate neighborhood of North Richmond to the more upscale but anonymous atmosphere of South Richmond. In North Richmond, his life had revolved around Shields Park and the legendary Charlie Reid, "a man I idolized." Reid ran the park and taught sports to young Clarence and so many others -- football, baseball, track, nighttime basketball, running, boxing. The park, in fact, is now called Shields-Reid Park. "That whole city of North Richmond was raised by that man," he says. It was "a neighborhood where mostly everybody knew everybody," and he never got into trouble there. But when the family moved to South Richmond, "the better part of town," when he was 15, Clarence fell in with a more rootless crowd. He can't explain how, but in a little time, "I just went astray and never got back on track. Maybe it was the wildness in me, maybe it was my destiny to do that." Whatever the reason, he began drinking and taking drugs with his new friends and was first sent to juvenile hall for taking a deck of cards and a knife from someone in a park. He was with a friend, and he was drunk. He also raided the lockers at a local bocce ball court. His first periods of imprisonment were in California Youth Authority institutions, which were "little kiddie places" back then. In time, he was back on the streets, with friends who were on heroin. He tried it when he was 19 or 20 -- "it was a real curiosity thing" -- and he was soon committing a range of property crimes to finance his habit. His first big crime was forgery of an unemployment check, which got him a civil commitment in a California prison supposedly geared to rehabilitation. That did nothing to slake his addiction, and dirty drug tests and other violations soon had him returning to prison regularly. In his mid 20s, Malbrough recalls, "I was mostly a follower," and one of the people he followed was an older friend who was a robber. "I had never been into that type of lifestyle," he says, but "it was fascinating to me back then -- quick money, fast money." He followed that man into a motel robbery that got him a five year-to-life sentence in San Quentin, of which he served 2 1/2 years. He was a model prisoner -- singing and taking classes in broadcasting, speed reading, landscaping and college academic subjects -- and the warden and others "went to bat for me." When he got to prison, he says, "I was still a child. ... I walked inside and it was a whole different world. Everyplace you went there was guns, and when you eat there's guns, when you sleep there's guns over you, watching you. There's people dying all around you. It was hell. Violence was rampant. It's totally different from being on the street -- it's a jungle, and only the strong survived. There was the prey and the predator. If you was not strong enough or knew someone who could give you the ropes on how to conduct yourself and how to grow into manhood, you didn't live. You died. I've seen a lot of my friends die. People there were so into killing each other." It was a deeply unsettling experience for a man of whom his youngest daughter says: "My father has never committed a violent act in his life." Or, in the words of Malbrough's sister Vivian, "I have never known my brother to harm anybody or try to hurt anyone. But I just felt he's always harmed himself." When he got out of prison, Malbrough held a variety of jobs, including several as a nurse's aide, and for a while he moderated his heroin use, using off and on. But he was a different person. Prison, he said, "clammed me up. I wasn't able to function on the street when I got out. You don't know how to relate to people anymore." This decades-long drug addict grows intense and eloquent as he expands on the ravages of prison and drugs. When you get out of prison, he says, "you want to do right, and then you meet resistance, and you're not that strong of a person anyway. You have frailties, you're insecure -- that's the reason you're in jail in the first place. ... They didn't provide anything for you to better the condition while you was in there. You was taught by the people of your peers who are in the same condition, and you're put back in the same environment when you get out." Heroin use, he continues, "is another crutch, another escape. You go into a shell when things don't want to go your way. You try to hide from the reality of your situation. ... It's frightful, and you fear that, and you fear jail, you fear what can happen to you. So the only peace that you find if you're into drugs would be that solitude or that escapism that you find from the peace that you get from your drugs -- for me, anyway." Out of prison and back on drugs in 1980, Malbrough asked a friend of a friend for some money. Some time later, when the man, who lived in the same building, asked for the money back. Malbrough didn't have it. The man called the cops. Malbrough says that the DA convinced the victim he was scared, which elevated the crime to a strongarm robbery. He also says that he was let into the man's apartment and didn't break in, as he was accused of doing. But in either case, he took a deal for three years of prison time and was sent back to state prison. It was his second "strike." No one claimed to have been injured in either of Malbrough's "strikes." Back in prison, Malbrough again sang in a gospel group. He also worked in a variety of positions, from nursing assistance to construction and cooking. A few years later, Malbrough was back in prison for a daytime residential burglary. He recalls that the judge didn't see him as a career criminal but rather as a "typical drug addict" engaging in property crimes. The judge, he says, wanted to send him to a drug program, but that option was not available because of his record, so he sentenced him to just two years because of the mitigating circumstances. As Malbrough and his wife went back and forth to prison because of the various crimes they committed to pay for their serious heroin habits -- and subsequent parole violations for dirty drug tests -- their three daughters were raised together by a "beautiful, Christian" foster family with whom they placed them. Malbrough emphasizes that the children were never taken from them by authorities and that they were raised by a good family with good values. When he and his wife were out of prison, the children would often come stay with them -- "the door was always open for us ... we were never shut out." Often, over the years, Malbrough tried to kick his heroin habit by going into programs. But, said his sister, most of the them were short detox programs and couldn't help him. And, adds a friend, the longer-term programs he explored, which might have done him some good, all had long waiting lists and didn't accept MediCal. Nor could he get a steady job. Many times, he said, he put in applications for positions for which he was well qualified but was not accepted because of his felony record. When he did once get a good job with an oil company, his parole officer showed up to verify that he was working; then, he said, with his felony record thus exposed, he was fired. After a while, he gave up on finding employment. Malbrough's life changed dramatically in 1989, after eight months in county jail for some petty thefts. He left his wife and fell in love with a woman who became an important, positive influence on him. His new woman friend, Saundra Dickens, was a straight, working woman who didn't know at first that he was using heroin. When she found out, she gave him an ultimatum. For the first time in his life, Malbrough gave up heroin cold-turkey, without having to go to jail or prison. Dickens stayed with him through the sickness of withdrawal and showed him he could do it by himself with good, loving care and food. Malbrough, who had spent most of his years "caught up in that street life," as Dickens put it, settled easily with her into a stable routine -- perhaps the first he had known since childhood. There were always lots of children and grandchildren around the house, and her children enjoyed the company of the man they called Dad. Malbrough and Dickens spent their evenings at home, playing Scrabble, canasta and backgammon and listening to music. They'd also have long discussions of current affairs. Through the more than four years they lived together, Dickens put her foot down whenever he slipped back to drugs, and as a result his drugless periods stretched longer and longer. At one point, he was drug-free for 16 months before backsliding. He spent much of 1992 and all of 1993 going through a variety of detox programs and looking for an opportunity to get into a methadone maintenance program. To get into one of the detox programs he even advanced $240 of his meager disability funds. The process would have been easier, said Dickens, if they could have afforded to live in a better neighborhood, where drugs were less readily available. "He truly wanted to quit," she said, but Malbrough still had a psychological dependency; whenever anything went wrong with his life -- like when they lost their home because of financial difficulties -- he'd return to the crutch of heroin. Shortly before his final arrest, once again on heroin and facing a string of petty theft charges, Malbrough realized he had reached the end of the line with his self-destructive way of life. Dickens, he says, "wanted her old guy back -- not this new guy on drugs, whom I don't like myself." They had separated, with the understanding that they would get together again if he got straightened out and found a new place for them to live. Malbrough was determined to "get back a life. ... I cried, and I prayed, and I got on this program." The program was a methadone treatment program run by Berkeley Addiction Treatment Services. It was not easy to get accepted; the program had a long waiting list. Every day, Malbrough went to the agency to see if his name had popped up. It took several months to get into the program. He entered the BATS 21-day detox program in February and began the maintenance program March 1. After he entered the BATS methadone program but before he began the regimen of individual counseling and group therapy sessions, Malbrough committed his last petty theft -- stealing the batteries from Payless. He wanted some money for cigarettes. He was, he says now, still "in the frame of mind of a heroin addict." Walter Byrd, executive director of BATS, says he recognized in Malbrough someone ready to change his ways. Malbrough, he said, was "tired of the same old grind," and he was persistent in seeking a slot in his program. But it does not surprise Byrd that Malbrough committed another petty theft after entering the program. It takes more than sobriety to change the behavior of a hardcore heroin user like Malbrough, he said, and "you can't do it alone -- you need help." "You don't know how to do things the way other people do," he said. The BATS program is designed to teach job, coping and social skills, and that process "certainly takes more than a few days." The treatment is "about learning to make good choices for yourself," Byrd said, and until then, recovering addicts will often revert to "whatever they learned to do to survive on the streets." Malbrough did not attempt to run or hide from his last crime. "From the very first," he says, "I always said that I did the crime -- there's no doubt about this. I cooperated in every way. It was a petty theft." Malbrough is familiar enough with the customary penalties for petty theft. In the weeks following his Payless theft, judges in Alameda County sentenced him for nearly identical offenses. He was given a three-day sentence for the cologne theft and 30 days for the Tylenol theft -- with a few more weeks of time dropped so he could continue in his methadone and counseling program. But before Malbrough was released from those sentences, an arrest warrant was issued by neighboring Contra Costa County for the batteries theft for which had previously been cited and released. Although the charge was nearly identical to the one for which he was doing 30 days, this time the sentence could be 25 years or more. He was brought to Contra Costa's West County Detention Facility, one of the first Californians to face the "three-strikes" charge. Subsequently, Malbrough was offered a deal by the Contra Costa prosecutors -- six years for the petty theft, by "striking" a prior -- but he rejected it. "I don't want six years for picking up some batteries -- that usually carries 30 days. It's not fair. They're not giving me that much time for petty theft. The only reason they'd give you that much time is because they're using your past record, and your past record shouldn't be held against you, because you already paid for that." Malbrough feels that the law shouldn't apply retroactively, with harsh new penalties set on the basis of crimes committed years before the "three strikes" law went into effect. "If they're gonna give people three strikes," he said, "they should start at one. Start it at the beginning, because [otherwise] everybody's already struck out -- the people that it's gonna hurt. ... It's not getting at the people they want to get to. Facing this newly legislated penalty is "a scary situation," he says, "it's hell. All your life goes before your eyes. And you see all your mistakes and wish that you could right them. You wish you could tell those people, `Hey, I'm not like that no more. Can't you see how much I've changed over the years. ... If you look at a person's record and see that he's making a good attempt and effort to right wrongs and to stop the things he was doing ... and is not a threat to society, then that person should be given another chance." Malbrough has found a kind of happiness despite the uncertainty of his present circumstances. Looking back, he says, "I think I was in a bubble and I couldn't find my way out of it. I just went round and round and round and round and round, and I finally found a way to get out of that bubble, and that's through my lord Jesus Christ. Now I'm happy." Clarence Malbrough still has dreams of what he would do if given another chance. He'd like to resume the drug program that was terminated by his incarceration. He'd like to continue his daily visits with his daughters and grandchildren. "We'd been doing a lot of catching up," said one daughter. And the children, who delighted in the wrestling, the park and zoo visits and the picnics with their recently returned grandfather, were devastated when he was unable to keep his promise to take them all to Marine World Africa USA. But before he gets to try his wings again, Malbrough must pay for his last crime, and how much he ought to pay is an issue that troubles all involved. He says, as his sister put it, that "he is willing to pay for his crime -- but not give up his life for a petty theft." Understandably, the Payless manager from whose store Malbrough stole the 13 packages of batteries does not see the crime as a simple petty theft. His store loses $1000 a day in disappearing inventory -- mostly through shoplifting -- and he finds it "extremely difficult to be sympathetic." Crimes like Malbrough's put his own job in jeopardy. But the manager, John Scalet, agonizes over what is the appropriate sentence for such a crime. He thinks the amount of the theft and the previous criminal history must be taken into account. "Every case is different," he says, "but if it's repeated -- if he's habitually a criminal -- then that's where `three strikes' has to come into play." However, he says, you also have to ask, "Is he gonna get better in jail or out of jail. Someone has to answer that question. I don't know. ... Fortunately I'm not in the situation where I have to make those decisions." In any case, he says, "it's hard for me to justify 25 years. ... Is 25 years too long? Probably. Could the person have been taught the same lesson in five? Probably." .