Subj : Re: Nodelist question
To   : MeaTLoTioN
From : Gamgee
Date : Thu Mar 21 2024 08:18:47

  Re: Re: Nodelist question
  By: MeaTLoTioN to Gamgee on Fri Mar 01 2024 11:40 pm

 > On 01 Mar 2024, Gamgee said the following...
 >
 >  Ga> Hi all,
 >
 >  Ga> Got today's new Nodelist and Infopack delivered today with accompanying
 >  Ga> .TIC files, which is great.  I do have a question:
 >
 >  Ga> In the nodelist archive (.Z61) there is the nodelist file and one other
 >  Ga> file named 'tqwnet.d86'.  This looks to be some kind of "difference"
 >  Ga> file or something for the nodelist, and is dated back in October 2023.
 >  Ga> Wondering why it's included with the updated nodelist.  The reason I
 >  Ga> ask  is that it makes my TIC processor unhappy (as I have a script
 >  Ga> which  copies the nodelist somewhere, and doesn't expect to see another
 >  Ga> file
 >  Ga> in the archive), and wondering if it can go away...

 > Well the tqwnet.d?? files _are_ part files, but interestingly the should
 > only be included if they belong to the same date as the main file, I have
 > removed that from the hatching until I fix the script correctly, thanks for
 > spotting the error.
 >
 > I  have rehatched the nodelist without the .d86 file, hopefully that'll make
 > your system (and others') happier.
 > Let me know how it goes.

Hello again,

I got a new Nodelist (.z82) today, thank you for that, but....  there is once 
again a "diff" file in the archive with a .d68 file extension.  Not sure why 
that would be in there, but it's the same issue as described above.  Can you 
check the script/hatching process again?

Thank you!
Dan
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
 * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1337:3/191)

.