Subj : Pro-active firewall?
To   : Jas Hud
From : Shurato
Date : Sat Jul 06 2024 20:40:00


* In a message originally to Shurato, Jas Hud said:

 > To: Shurato Re: Pro-active firewall? By: Shurato to Jas Hud on Sat
 > Jul 06 2024 11:51 am

 >  >  JH> okay well what if it just detects their terminal wrong?

 >  >  JH> you should use synchronet as a front end for your bbses.

 >  > I certainly don't want people to have to log in twice...

 > they wouldn't be logging in twice if you did it correctly. you would
 > be using synchronet as a front end. it would pick up and you could
 > use the fossil for your inferior bbs that  doesn't have a fossil.
 > you could also benefit from the banning/blocking  features.

 > People have been doing it for 24 years.

It's a Win32 BBS and doesn't need a fossil except for when running DOS doors,
which netfoss is written for.  I could use syncfoss as well if I wanted to.
I could use Mystic just as easily.

--
Shurato, Sysop Shurato's Heavenly Sphere (ssh, telnet, pop3, ftp,nntp,
,wss) (Ports 22,23,110,21,119,8080) (ssh login 'bbs' pass 'shsbbs').


---
 * Origin: Shurato's Heavenly Sphere telnet://shsbbs.net (618:300/50)

.