Subj : Movie: Primer To : Arelor From : Ogg Date : Sun May 11 2025 08:02:00 Hello Arelor! ** On Monday 05.05.25 - 10:07, Arelor wrote to Jimmy Anderson: A> I am definitively not a Primer fan. Give me Synchronicity A> any day. A> Primer definitively needed better production than it got, A> the dialogue scenes were made hard to follow because they A> tried to make them realistic (with people speaking over A> each other and interrupting each other, which is how works A> in real life, but makes it messy for the screen). And the A> plot was kind of meh. It was material to be subjected for A> the Eight Deadly Words (I don't care what happens to these A> people). It was a grueling watch for me. The plot seemed disjointed. I really hated the "speak over" that you mentioned. Reading the wikipedia version of the plot helped, but I am not interested to rewatch it to see if it clicks better after knowing what to expect. The "A<->B" (and the wikipedia shows an illustration of it) still makes little sense to me. Originally it's some weight-reduction experiment, but then it turns out to be a time-machine? I generally have trouble embrasing the idea that "one" machine and the actions of one person can alter a whole timeline of future history affecting millions of people. Time travel is a fun idea, but trying to present it in film or story form simply breaks down at some point. I think there are other "time machine" films that are much more entertaining. A> They nailed the part were they discovered time travel, A> because I think they reproduced quite well how scientific A> advances are done. People does janky stuff and notices A> something weird, then say "look, this is interesting, why A> do you think it is happening?" Ok.. but that's just a brief scene. The rest of the film seemed like a series of disjointed scenes. I really liked the way the filmaker/director/writers of Mememto stitched the story together for a powerful conclusion. --- OpenXP 5.0.64 * Origin: Ogg's WestCoast Point (21:4/106.21) .