Subj : ipv6 resolvability
To   : David Gonzalez
From : Michiel van der Vlist
Date : Tue Nov 19 2024 11:37:58

Hello David,

On Sunday November 17 2024 22:55, you wrote to me:

 MV>> Are you sure you can't get more than just a /64?  If not, for me
 MV>> that would be a reason to take my bussines elsewhere...

 DG> Yup, trust me, been there, done that, but that unfortunately is the
 DG> only one that you can get to do bridge mode on the CPE for IPv4,

What type of fysical connection do you have? DSL over 600 Ohm 2 wire? DOCSIS over coax? Opical over glasfiber?

I am in the fortunate position to have a choice between the three. Although DSL is no longer interesting compared to coax or fiberglass.

 DG> we're way behind down here in South America (except Brazil) when it
 DG> comes to v6, as I said I throw hate everytime I can to those grumpy
 DG> old-men with their brains stuck on IPv4 and the /30 and v4 VLSM
 DG> practices migrated to IPv6.

There are only two IPv6 capable Fidonet nodes in Z4. The first is your ZC elect Fernando Toledo. You are the second.

 DG> The otehr issue I do not want to rn n into is using Tunnelbroker, it's
 DG> slow because of it's 6to4 tunnel nature, but it's an alternative, I do
 DG> like HE, but being a VPN and its inherent drawbacks drives me away.

He.net has been providing a fantatic service to the IPv6 community. I have had an he.net tunnel for many years. When I finally got native IPv6 in 2016 I did not need them any more. But I am still gratefull for here fantastic service. They even managed to get the "sage T-shirt" delivered exactly on the day of my 70th birthday!


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
 * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)

.