Subj : Re: FidoNews submission To : Bj”rn Felten From : Dan Clough Date : Thu May 29 2025 08:49:41 -=> Bj”rn Felten wrote to Dan Clough <=- BF>> If IPv4 is busy, use IPv6. It's never busy. Welcome to the 21st BF>> century. DC> Busy? It's a binkp connection attempt, not a phone call. Duh. BF> LOL! Your expert opinion is duly noted. It's not an opinion, it's simple fact. Multiple binkp connections can happen at the same time, unlike a modem/phone connection. Your nodelist entry specifies "CM", "IBN", and "INA". Let me know if you need some clarification on what those terms mean. DC> I don't have IPv6, as my ISP doesn't offer it. BF> I've enjoyed IPv6 for almost two decades now, despite not having BF> native IPv6 support. That's a really bad excuse. Try he.net like so BF> many of us before we got native IPv6. It's even FREE of CHARGE! It wasn't an "excuse", just a statement of fact. I could not care less about having/using IPv6. Version 4 works just fine. DC> Fix your shit. BF> Yes, Massa Gimme-Gimme. I will, of course, immediately see if I can BF> give your Very Important Traffic on a depreciated network protocol, BF> such as IPv4, higher priority. It's not "deprecated" (the proper spelling of what you mean). It's a world-wide standard, in widespread use. Also, I wasn't asking for higher priority, just that your system match what it advertises as it's capabilities. CM/IBN/INA. There aren't any "busy signals". BF> It might mean that my paying customers will have to accept reduced BF> speed, but I'm sure they understand that a VIP, entitled non-paying BF> client, must be given the highest priority. Why would it affect them at all? Are you using some kind of deprecated hardware, or something? I just tried replying to your netmail to me, and .... yep, can't get a connection to 2:203/2. It'll keep trying, and maybe eventually get through. Strange how your system(s) are so unreliable. .... All the easy problems have been solved. === MultiMail/Linux v0.52 --- SBBSecho 3.25-Linux * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115) .