X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,86ddb81593968e62
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Original-To: rec-arts-ascii@robomod.net
From: mikepenick@gmail.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii
Subject: Re: [DIS] future of rec.arts.ascii
X-Original-Date: 25 Feb 2005 20:59:27 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1109393967.212757.128680@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
References: <Xns960166FF28514raamoderator@ID-77355.user.dfncis.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Injection-Info: o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.81.121.75;
   posting-account=ydDDsg0AAAAdBTEfC5tMNIBDTAHjL6JC
X-Gweep-Robomod-Bayes-Score: 0.0001
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:00:11 -0600
Approved: rec-arts-ascii-moderator@robomod.net
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sol01.isp.gweep.ca!not-for-mail
Xref: g2news1.google.com rec.arts.ascii:50

I agree with Wilu, it isnt just this group, rather the ASCII scene in
general is in a lull.

Personally I prefer rec.arts.ascii for posting and would rather see it
continue even in its "low fequency of posts" condition.

Another issue for me personally is my only posting access is via
google/gmail which I have issues with.
       _
      {   -.
    {  =@=  }
     `-  _}
       (
        )
       (
|
|                 _
|                {   -.
|              {  =@=  }
|               `-  _}
|                 (
|                  )
|                 (
|
MJP