X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,86ddb81593968e62
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Original-To: rec-arts-ascii@robomod.net
From: Wilu <lwilk.nospam@o2.pl>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii
Subject: Re: [DIS] future of rec.arts.ascii
X-Original-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:42:51 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <pan.2005.02.22.13.42.40.144102@o2.pl>
References: <Xns960166FF28514raamoderator@ID-77355.user.dfncis.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing
 moment of clarity.)
X-Gweep-Cleanmime: -qp
X-Gweep-Robomod-Bayes-Score: 0.0001
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:44:09 -0600
Approved: rec-arts-ascii-moderator@robomod.net
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sol01.isp.gweep.ca!not-for-mail
Xref: g2news1.google.com rec.arts.ascii:48

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:29:49 -0600, Graham Drabble wrote:

> Hi all,

Hi Graham.
 
 
> moderation. Given the existance of alt.ascii-art I don't think there is
> much call for the group to continue.

I don't see to much traffic on other newsgoups about ascii-art also. It's not
particularl problem of r.a.a. it's general problem of ascii-art. In spite 
of all, I have a strong hope that it's just a temporary problem.
In my humble opinion, r.a.a. should exist as long as someone is posting 
his work to r.a.a.