X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,8295a2b8c38b4acc,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public From: joe@sfbooks.com (Joe Bernstein) Subject: Re: Revived? Date: 1997/09/13 Message-ID: <5vek5l$ok@huitzilo.tezcat.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 272170040 References: <01bcbd40$b46c8a20$c8f89bce@default> Organization: The Stars Our Destination Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii Posted with a forged approval and cc: to the moderator contact address, in case anyone's there. DejaNews shows no posts to this group this year, which implies that Mr. Oglesbee's two posts didn't reach them, but they did reach me, so... CC's to other relevant people. (Ironically, the Collabra control message spew in August did include a newgroup unmoderating this group - no Tezcat did *not* honour it, that is *not* how I saw this post - to which tale replied with a newgroup remoderating it. That's what DN *will* show you for this group this year.) In article <01bcbd40$b46c8a20$c8f89bce@default>, Jonathon R. Oglesbee wrote: > Hello..... Helllo..... Earth calling..... Hi. The reason there's nothing here is that the moderator isn't home, near as I can tell. You might want to try the alt.* ascii-art groups, if you get any of them. Or you might want to go to news.groups and look into an RFD to un-moderate rec.arts.ascii, which was proposed for removal from the list of groups back in May by the highly respected Jonathan Grobe. (No, nothing's been done, and the group isn't going to disappear right away; but if anyone's interested, they might as well get moving.) For further info on news.groups and how groups are made there, feel free to consult an FAQ on my web site. If you decide after reading a little of it that it isn't helping you, skip to the references at the end - there are lots of FAQs to choose from, this is just the easiest address for me to remember. You might also check out the record on the un-moderation of misc.handicap, which is the major precedent: Hope that helps. (Note to news.groups: There is also on-topic traffic in the part of Usenet for which comp.laser-printers is unmoderated; this is another group whose removal Jonathan Grobe had suggested; there, too, I'd rather see it go unmoderated. Yes, I know it's obvious that both that and rec.arts.ascii could drown in posts if unmoderated, but I don't see what else to do.) Joe Bernstein -- Joe Bernstein, writer, secretary, and bookseller joe@sfbooks.com Speaking for myself alone http://www.tezcat.com/~josephb