X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,b366fdba6431f3ec X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public From: Rosemary Lyndall Wemm Subject: Talk-Line: Music staffs Date: 1996/01/14 Message-ID: <4daqsq$6vj@miso.wwa.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 135174257 sender: boba@sashimi.wwa.com organization: haywire.DIALix.COM newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii On 12 Jan 1996, The Minstrel wrote: A detailed analysis of my "analysis" of Bob's melodic offering and finished with: > None of the above comments are intended to cause offense - And none of mine were, either :-) I guess it doesn't pay to post Aussie humour (which is highly irreverent) in a forum read by lots of Americans :-) :-) :-) The citing of obviously fictitious Manuals of "correct composition" should have alerted you to the true nature of the piece. I was actually rather surprised that Bob chose to post my tongue-in-check analysis at all. As the last line shows I suggested that he post only the suitable bits, and I assumed that he would consider the melodic "analysis" to be irrelevant. I didn't post it in my parallel posting on alt.ascii-art. Rosemary from the Far Side = = o * l e x = = = -,. l r i u = = =I 0 \ a i l a = = = + - D ) d @ w a . = = =I 0 / n y i z = = - '` y a d o = = o * l h . .