X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 110f55,f648d1ae9fdc2380,start X-Google-Attributes: gid110f55,public X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,f648d1ae9fdc2380,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public X-Google-Thread: f996b,f648d1ae9fdc2380,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: boba@wwa.com (Bob Allison) Subject: Talk: Dark on light ASCII art Date: 1995/10/18 Message-ID: <463su7$9sb@miso.wwa.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 117724958 approved: boba@wwa.com sender: boba@sashimi.wwa.com references: <46145p$3vr@news0.accent.net> organization: WorldWide Access - Chicago Area Internet Services x-url: http://miso.wwa.com/~boba/ newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii,alt.ascii-art,alt.binaries.pictures.ascii T. Simpson wrote: > > Yes, WinNotepad is an ASCII Editor, but sometimes you have to >fiddle with it for ASCII to look good. Main reason is it ignores a lot of >the formatting that ASCII Artists use. That, and ASCII Art doesn't look >the same on white background as it does on black. ASCII art tends to look better if it's made light on dark, but in many instances people are using software that displays dark on light. I have a collection of art I think looks good dark on light. It's called the Scarecrow's Special. It's available at: ftp://ftp.wwa.com/pub/Scarecrow/ -- :: ____/: ___/: ___ /: ___ /: ___/: ___/: ___ /: ___ /: / / / : /::::: /:::: /:: /: /:: ,/: /:::: /:::: /:: ,/: /:: /: / / /: __ /: /:::: ___ /: ___ ,:: ___/: /:::: ___ ,:: /:: /: / / /:: ::: /: /:::: /:: /: /:: |: /:::: /:::: /:: |: /:: /: / / /::: ____/:_____/:__/::__/:__/::__/:_____/:_____/:__/::__/:_______/:________/::::