X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,21a7f86475b17564 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-06-15 16:46:28 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!uunet!news2.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!gagme.wwa.com!not-for-mail From: Newsmistress Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii Subject: Re: test Date: 15 Jun 1994 18:48:55 -0500 Organization: WorldWide Access (SM) Chicagoland Internet Services Lines: 19 Sender: boba@gagme.wwa.com Approved: boba@gagme.wwa.com Message-ID: <2to417$dnr@gagme.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: gagme.wwa.com Today I received a response to a test message in rec.arts.ascii, from someone puzzled as to why I, who should know better, would post a test to a non-*.test group: > From: news@midway.uchicago.edu (News Administrator) > Subject: test > Date: 14 Jun 1994 15:36:27 -0500 > Message-ID: <2tl4cb$jir@gagme.wwa.com> I didn't, and I'd like to disclaim having done so. My guess is that one of my users with a misconfigured NNTP client posted the article; I'll attempt to track this down locally. (I'll also note, for future reference, that the test article had no .signature; my articles always do.) -- Ellen Keyne Seebacher news@uchinews.uchicago.edu