X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,6e62599975d70352
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-07-06 10:14:22 PST
Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!gagme.wwa.com!not-for-mail
From: tda10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Tim)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii
Subject: Re: LINE: impossible object - need work
Date: 6 Jul 1994 12:19:48 -0500
Organization: U of Cambridge, England
Lines: 22
Sender: boba@gagme.wwa.com
Approved: boba@gagme.wwa.com
Message-ID: <2vep3k$t8@gagme.wwa.com>
References: <2uqamo$jd6@gagme.wwa.com> <2uqti5$1qn@gagme.wwa.com>
 <2utgln$fnc@gagme.wwa.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gagme.wwa.com


In article <2utgln$fnc@gagme.wwa.com>, pschulz@physics.adelaide.edu.au (Paul Schulz) writes:
|> >THE PENROSE TRIANGLE.
|> Shouldn't this be 'Escher's Triangle'? 

No.  Escher's published works were always far more elaborate.  He was an
artist, wheras Penrose is a mathematician.

   ________
  / _____ /\
 / /\____ \ \
/________\ \ \
\___________\/

Tim.
-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|University of Cambridge Computing Service - Unix-Support                     |
|Tim Auckland                                  <tda10@ucs.cam.ac.uk>          |
|Not to be taken seriously...                                                 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+