X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,635abe35e45cf4df,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,8f4c21caa57c8f45 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public X-Google-Thread: 110f55,635abe35e45cf4df,start X-Google-Attributes: gid110f55,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-08-10 20:01:08 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!gagme.wwa.com!not-for-mail From: boba@wwa.com (Bob Allison) Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii,alt.ascii-art,alt.binaries.pictures.ascii Subject: Talk: Tumbling letters Date: 10 Aug 1994 20:59:13 -0500 Organization: WorldWide Access - Chicago Area Internet Services 312-282-8605 Lines: 55 Sender: boba@gagme.wwa.com Approved: boba@wwa.com Message-ID: <32c0lh$a9i@gagme.wwa.com> References: <32653p$1f72@tinman.dev.prodigy.com> <32buga$91l@gagme.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: gagme.wwa.com Xref: bga.com rec.arts.ascii:1178 alt.ascii-art:11068 alt.binaries.pictures.ascii:945 Brett Miller wrote: > >Hey Scarecrow (or someone else)- > >I haven't seen one of your .sigs like the following, although I think it >would look pretty cool- > >Use 3-d block letters at different rotations/tilts, so it looks like the >letters were dropped from the sky or are wobbley or something. I think you're talking about tumbling letters, like: __ ____ __ ____ __ __ /\ \ / \_\ / /\ / \ \ / |\ / /\ / \_\ / /\ |_| / / /| /\ \ \ / ||/ / / / /\ | |\ \/ /_/_ / / / \ \/ \ \ / |/ / / / \/ |_| \ __ \_\ /_/ / \ /\ \_\ / /| / / / /\ ./_/ \ \ \/_/_\_\/ \ \ \/_// / | / / \ \/ |_| \ \_\ /_/\ \ \_\ /_/ /|_/ / \__/_/ \/_/ \_\/ \/_/ \_\/ \_\/ I've tried to do tumbling letters for 'Scarecrow' but there isn't enough room to do them well enough. I guess I should try again. It is possible to do it like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ut making them tumble uses too much space side to side. I suppose I could make them tumble if I made them smaller, but I don't know if it would work out either. There are a lot of sigs I have made for myself that I have never used, because they didn't turn out the way I thought they would. -- -:-:-- :--=- =-==-= =#=###= ###### ##=#= =##-=#- ==-=-- -=- -:- -:- ::-:--: :--=-= -=-====# =#=##=#= ###### ##=##= #=#==-#= -=-==--- =-: --: :-: :-: :-- =-= =-= -== =## ### ##= =#= =-= ==- =-- -=- -:- -:: :-::-- -:- -=-==-== =#==##= ##### ##= #===#=- -=- -=- =-= -:- ::- ::-:-- -:- --==--== ==###= ##### ##= =#=#=- ==- --= -=- --: :-: :-- :-- -== =-= #=# =## ### #=# #=# =-= =-- -=- =-: -:- -:: ::-::-- -:--=- =-= -== =#= ##= ###### ##=#=# =#= #=- ==--=--- -=--:--:-:-:: :::-:- -:-== -=- =-= =## =## ###### ##=#= ##= =#= -==--= =-=--:--:::