X-Google-Language: POLISH,Latin2 X-Google-Thread: 1045ba,5c10f0d1a8dd574b X-Google-Attributes: gid1045ba,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-12 12:14:35 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-05!supernews.com!feed.textport.net!news.uni-stuttgart.de!news.iesy.de!troll.iesy.de!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!news.tpi.pl!not-for-mail From: StfoReK Newsgroups: pl.rec.ascii-art Subject: Re: Stforek -- Co z moimi Sigami? Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 19:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Organization: There is no Legal Corporation Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: stfor@wp.pl NNTP-Posting-Host: pf133.warszawa.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.tpi.pl 1023909262 4778 213.76.101.133 (12 Jun 2002 19:14:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@tpi.pl NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 19:14:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com pl.rec.ascii-art:12217 W artykule Leszek Ciszewski napisa�(a): > "WiktorM" > >> > Stforek -- Co z moimi Sigami? >> Nadal �le oznaczone :) > StfoRek. StfoReK :) >> Skoro potrafisz ingerowa� w nag��wki (jaki� zewn�trzny program?), >> to mo�e b�dziesz potrafi� poprawi� i ten b��d OE. > > 0. Kt�ry b��d? > 1. Nie potrafi�. :) B��d sygnaturkowy :) -- \\-O-// \\-O-// /\o o/\ : stfor(at)wp.pl [gg: 1259894 : /\o o/\ ! '.' ! : LinuxRegisteredUser: 250035 : ! '.' ! \ .Y. / : http://www.jestesmoj.kompel? : \ .Y. / //-\\ //-\\ fsc