X-Google-Thread: f996b,772d88a2cb044c38 X-Google-Thread: 102524,772d88a2cb044c38 X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,772d88a2cb044c38 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,gid102524,gid109d8a,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.freenet.de!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!amsnews11.chello.com!news.chello.nl.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "jer0en" Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,alt.math,sci.math References: <107cc$489839c8$3ec23315$29800@news.chello.nl> <48984494.4CCC0C3E@tesco.net> Subject: Re: abstraction = compression Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:33:25 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <4891f$490b5f66$3ec21f53$5890@news.chello.nl> X-Complaints-To: abuse@chello.nl Organization: chello.nl Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.194.31.83 (62.194.31.83) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:41:26 +0100 X-Trace: 4891f490b5f669b67baf605890 Xref: g2news1.google.com alt.ascii-art:379 alt.math:1213 sci.math:41204 if processing and storage resources of the marker would be sufficient, the encryption key could simply be a complete copy of each individual's DNA which, together with some sort of ontogenetical algorithm, would "render" the entire individual, fingerprints and irises included. moreover, if the ontogenetical algorithm could be run in reverse, it would allow the marker to determine the DNA of individuals to specifications. if that DNA could be physically reproduced and inserted into egg cells, such individuals could be physically created. there are facts even in common reality weakly indicating that this would be the case. since we do not currently have any such processing and storage resources ourselves, nor the ontogenetical algorithm, we would already have the key but not the means to use it.