X-Google-Thread: f996b,772d88a2cb044c38 X-Google-Thread: 102524,772d88a2cb044c38 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,gid102524,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!novia!amsnews11.chello.com!news.chello.nl.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "jer0en" Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,alt.math,sci.math References: <107cc$489839c8$3ec23315$29800@news.chello.nl> <48984494.4CCC0C3E@tesco.net> Subject: Re: abstraction = compression Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:06:13 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: abuse@chello.nl Organization: chello.nl Lines: 6 NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.194.31.83 (62.194.31.83) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:14:13 +0100 X-Trace: a2442490af6959b67baf629974 Xref: g2news2.google.com alt.ascii-art:1412 alt.math:4977 sci.math:152816 otoh, the higher the safety level of a hacked encryption key, the more certain the fact of the encryption. the proof would stand like the universe itself.