X-Google-Thread: f996b,772d88a2cb044c38 X-Google-Thread: 102524,772d88a2cb044c38 X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,772d88a2cb044c38 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,gid102524,gid109d8a,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.germany.com!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!amsnews11.chello.com!news.chello.nl.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "jer0en" Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,alt.math,sci.math References: <107cc$489839c8$3ec23315$29800@news.chello.nl> <48984494.4CCC0C3E@tesco.net> Subject: Re: abstraction = compression Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:18:34 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: abuse@chello.nl Organization: chello.nl Lines: 10 NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.194.31.83 (62.194.31.83) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:26:30 +0100 X-Trace: e786c490a50b69b67baf621373 Xref: g2news1.google.com alt.ascii-art:370 alt.math:1208 sci.math:40980 I'm sorry for reacting this late, but though I'm sceptical about quite a number of things, I would have to concede to the fact that there seems to be more than sufficient space in the total of possibilities of human fingerprints as well as our irises to allow a zero number of matches being due to coincidence to remain plausible in basicly any form of reality that would be plausible. That is, without figures as to the contrary. could you make the paranoia stick numerically?