X-Google-Thread: f996b,7111c3b88b78a801,start X-Google-Thread: 10774d,7111c3b88b78a801,start X-Google-Thread: 107d75,7111c3b88b78a801,start X-Google-Thread: 112ab3,7111c3b88b78a801,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,gid10774d,gid107d75,gid112ab3,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad01!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Message-Id: Subject: MI5 Persecution: Latest technology 31/7/96 (3357) Newsgroups: alt.pedophilia.girls,alt.ascii-art,alt.cellular,alt.flame.jesus.christ,alt.guitar.effects Followup-To: alt.pedophilia.girls,alt.ascii-art,alt.cellular,alt.flame.jesus.christ,alt.guitar.effects,uk.misc From: MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk Date: 20 Aug 2007 14:25:23 GMT Lines: 50 Organization: news.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Xref: g2news2.google.com alt.pedophilia.girls:11 alt.ascii-art:244 alt.cellular:934 alt.flame.jesus.christ:12192 alt.guitar.effects:1198 X-Original-Lines: 46 X-Original-Bytes: 2937 From: Jon Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,alt.politics.british,uk.media Subject: Surveillance Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 23:20:19 +0100 Organization: - Lines: 29 Distribution: world Message-ID: References: <105319Z26071996@anon.penet.fi> <4tfo1f$rvc@morgana.netcom.net.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: jongru.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: jongru.demon.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: Turnpike Version 1.12 In article <4tfo1f$rvc@morgana.netcom.net.uk>, "B.Jury" writes >an410901@anon.penet.fi wrote: >> ... Normal surveillance >>"mini-cameras" are quite noticeable and require visible supporting >>circuitry. It seems to me the best place to put a small video surveillance >>device would be additional to a piece of electronic equipment such as a TV >>or video. > >I would imagine it is quite easy to compleatly hida a camera, even in >a familar enviroment, such as a persons home. You only need a hole the >size of a pin hole, for the camera to see through. This is true. I frequently employ private detectives to spy on people (there's a good reason for this and I'll tell you if you guess correctly) and one such detective showed me the latest technology only last week. A small rucksack. One strap of the rucksack has a tiny hole in it that you wouldn't notice unless someone pointed to it. That's the camera: the wires lead into the rucksack itself where there is a video tape recorder little bigger than a Walkman. I don't know if that's what Roger Cook uses but it certainly explains why it is that the subject can look straight into the lens and not realise (s)he's being filmed. Now, I say "latest technology" and I think that's the technology that the police use as well as the retired police who become private detectives, but no doubt the security services have far more sophisticated equipment. -- Jon 3357 -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access