X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,aaba0d0b6dc1b0b5 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-31 01:39:08 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!h180n1fls34o1115.telia.COM!not-for-mail From: Veronica Karlsson Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: ASCII Stuff Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 08:51:27 +0000 Lines: 37 Message-ID: <3ED86D0F.545656B7@hotbrev.com> References: <1103_1053199699@news.kolumbus.fi> <3ec7046b$0$3540$626a54ce@news.free.fr> <1105_1053360226@news.kolumbus.fi> <3ED7994D.31F94B1F@hotbrev.com> <3ed7edaa$0$4585$626a54ce@news.free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: h180n1fls34o1115.telia.com (213.67.71.180) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1054370347 7534519 213.67.71.180 (16 [58193]) X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04 (X11; I; Linux 2.2.22-6.2.3 i586) Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:23372 BoD wrote: > > Me I find it more logical to top post: in the article n+1 the "new" content > is more important than the content from article n. If article n+1 is a response to article n then it often does not make sense if the reader has not already read article n (or has not read it very recently). In email you can assume that the reader has done that. On usenet you cannot. > The more important thing > should not appear in the end of the message, but at the top. I agree. That's why the quoted stuff should be kept *short*. /\ / \ / \ / \ / \ /_ _\ | | | clue | | | | | |______| -- ##### c ^ OO /\\\\ ##### | /|\ `^^^^^^^%-- '||` | \\\\ ####-[.]\ / \ " " \ ha ha ha dd /[.]-\\\| ### _| |_ \\| ### (_ http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/cgi/asciichat/ _)} == \ / A S C I I A R T C H A T # ||\