X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,37c85d0f54d64691 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-17 09:37:06 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!usenet01.sei.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!lmtp2nntp!not-for-mail From: "Arthur J. O'Dwyer" Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: impossible figure Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 12:30:36 -0400 (EDT) Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: <3EC60965.7D9C2CD@hotbrev.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: smtp5.andrew.cmu.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: bb3.andrew.cmu.edu 1053189036 15910 128.2.10.85 (17 May 2003 16:30:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: advisor@andrew.cmu.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 May 2003 16:30:36 GMT In-Reply-To: <3EC60965.7D9C2CD@hotbrev.com> Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:23169 On Sat, 17 May 2003, Veronica Karlsson wrote: > > Arthur J. O'Dwyer wrote: > > > > And the last picture, diddled to put the stream behind the building, > > rather than in front: > > > The original has that part in front of the building: > > http://www.siteaboutnothing.com/images/escher-waterfall.jpg > > (and I looked quite closely at that when I made that ascii version) Yeah; I didn't mean to suggest otherwise. Yours is a really great picture! But the receding perspective on the stream is harder to grasp in ASCII art, so I thought that making the stream obviously "recede" behind the building was a good way to make the optical illusion stand out, even if it did make it less faithful to the original. -Arthur ObASCII: _ `.\ ._, ,-+._J | ( __> `._, `-\ ; _.,) ._] '_.- `-./``-/ |-' < [ \,' Apparently, Escher can draw lizards better than I can, too.