X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,aaba0d0b6dc1b0b5 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-31 00:43:23 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed2.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!news.alt.net!usenet From: Emil Nitrate Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: ASCII Stuff Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 02:43:21 -0500 Organization: "ANI Dis,, Inc. Lines: 12 Message-ID: <3edd5ce6.107773500@pita.alt.net> References: <1103_1053199699@news.kolumbus.fi> <3ec7046b$0$3540$626a54ce@news.free.fr> <1105_1053360226@news.kolumbus.fi> <3ED7994D.31F94B1F@hotbrev.com> <3ed7edaa$0$4585$626a54ce@news.free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:23367 Amen, brother. In message <3ed7edaa$0$4585$626a54ce@news.free.fr> "BoD" wrote: >Me I find it more logical to top post: in the article n+1 the "new" content >is more important than the content from article n. The more important thing >should not appear in the end of the message, but at the top. It's not >natural to have to scroll to the end of the page to read it. > >BoD