X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,7f7c27dff2e0ba1 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-04 03:51:47 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.nacamar.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!dsl-217-155-199-78.zen.co.UK!not-for-mail From: Mark Hill Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Another flower in the series Date: 4 Jun 2003 10:51:46 GMT Lines: 30 Message-ID: <2003-06-04T10-42-18@bubble.markhill.me.uk> References: <2003-06-03T14-02-41@bubble.markhill.me.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: dsl-217-155-199-78.zen.co.uk (217.155.199.78) X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1054723906 11093925 217.155.199.78 (16 [123679]) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4pl2 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:23490 On 2003-06-04, Quasipsyco wrote: > Mark laid claim to the following perspective: >> It reminds me of a marigold. > > Actually it was a pinkish color and had a cat in the pic, Oh, I see. :-) > but at this > time I'm working on a series of flowers to help build skill. I think I'd like to the same with robots. > Though if you liked it then that's good enough for me. ;-) Fair enough. :) >> You'll find some at > > Thank you. > I had Faux_Pseudo check it out and not many flowers were found. I knew they had lots of nature pics from the NOAA (or one of those agencies), and a quick search on flowers brought a few pics, so I thought it might have been good. Oh well. :) -- Mark Hill