X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,5512d455b657a16e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-10 16:40:22 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: lgbeard <lgbeard@bullreguard.nut>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: Aliens vs. Predator
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 18:34:15 -0600
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <h5eg4vo847lu1bmaq196g6jjpjgjvc4m4o@4ax.com>
References: <zen1a.7263$1q2.688022@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
 <111f5200.0302090715.1063e050@posting.google.com>
 <6vsc4v08k8r5clmrvh4rvj834hb05sflt6@4ax.com>
 <111f5200.0302091425.44bec644@posting.google.com>
 <YVG1a.8716$tO2.837517@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
 <111f5200.0302100742.648b646e@posting.google.com>
 <3pnf4vgb4d75804iinr5tfhejg31eh3447@4ax.com>
 <111f5200.0302101506.40f88b55@posting.google.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 52
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:21794

On 10 Feb 2003 15:06:14 -0800, alien_eggman@yahoo.com (Alien Eggman) wrote:

>lgbeard <lgbeard@bullreguard.nut> wrote in message news:<3pnf4vgb4d75804iinr5tfhejg31eh3447@4ax.com>...
>> On 10 Feb 2003 07:42:42 -0800, alien_eggman@yahoo.com (Alien Eggman) wrote:
>> 
>             <sniped my own message>
>> After about 5 inches on snow last night :) have a little time
>> and went back to archives, checked here...but not could
>> confirm that the original author was Zeus. But it was used as 
>> sig sometimes for Zeus. Found some with credits, found some 
>> without.
>> 
>> here... and it was not here
>> http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Parthenon/9573/scrap1.html
>>              _,._
>>            ,'   ,`-.
>> |.        /     |\  `.
>> \ \      (  ,-,-` ). `-._ __
>>  \ \      \|\,'     `\  /'  `\
>>   \ \      ` |, ,  /  \ \     \
>>    \ \         `,_/`, /\,`-.__/`.
>>     \ \            | ` /    /    `-._
>>      \\\           `-/'    /         `-.
>>       \\`/ _______,-/_   /'             \
>>      ---'`|       |`  ),' `---.  ,       |
>>       \..-`--..___|_,/          /       /
>>                  |    |`,-,...,/      ,'     
>>                  \    | |_|   /     ,' __  r-'',
>>                   |___|/  |, /  __ /-''  `'`)  |  
>>                _,-'   ||__\ /,-' /     _,.--|  (
>>             .-'       )   `(_   / _,.-'  ,-' _,/
>>              `-------'       `--''       `'''
>> 
>
>Should i add his sig in then, or leave it with the ??? ?
Again maybe someone else knows who did this or can confirm it 
was done by zeus.

There are so many good pieces of work out there that is not
credited. IMHO when diddling an old piece of work after tring 
to find out who did it with no sucess might be handle this way.
[No Sig]/ person who is doing the diddling, if the group agrees.
There is also the lack of respect/permission that someone must 
deal with also.

Just a thought --
Did you try an e-mail from the addy on the page ? to get it confrim.

Hope that i am not sounding like an overbearing arsewhole but it
sure fills that way to me.

lgbeard