X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,f1109e89c6ab007e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-25 17:56:10 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
From: "Tom Bampton" <moley@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: ascii art underground
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 01:56:08 +0100
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <apcp78$bdl$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk>
References: <R_Vk9.10032$kF.886437@twister.columbus.rr.com>
 <an1sqe$5cq$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>
 <069jpugvvq22vk3rsr4tv23d4endk4p0nu@4ax.com>
 <slrnapjsj3.1ig.Faux_Pseudo@fugozi.cx1209071-a>
 <esidquchr110rhameecb2t8mqebbq59sdu@4ax.com>
 <slrnaqef93.c4.Faux_Pseudo@fugozi.cx1209071-a>
 <ha2gqu05aou68lk0m2ddf3ospc9led2nv6@4ax.com>
 <Pine.SOL.4.44.0210130240460.783-100000@yellow.csi.cam.ac.uk>
 <rgcaruc2avpkh0aqvbjruvgn2aogornfea@4ax.com>
 <slrnarbdv6.kq.Faux_Pseudo@fugozi.cx1209071-a>
 <01hhrukpfq3b4v9kasgta9dg3cuoe733f9@4ax.com>
 <pan.2002.10.25.13.02.41.10589.1855@yahoo.com>
 <apcb65$16a$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>
 <pan.2002.10.25.17.02.50.583695.1844@yahoo.com>
 <slrnarjo82.kq.Faux_Pseudo@fugozi.cx1209071-a>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edendev.demon.co.uk
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1035593769 11701 193.237.172.117 (26 Oct 2002
 00:56:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:56:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Priority: 3
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:20165


"Faux_Pseudo" <Faux_Pseudo@yahoo.comERCIAL> wrote in message
news:slrnarjo82.kq.Faux_Pseudo@fugozi.cx1209071-a...

> >>> (I'm speechless)
> >>
> >> I'm tempted to invoke Godwin ...
> >
> > How does being speechless allow anyone to invoke Godwin?
>
> Call it Godwin light.  Following up to say "I'm speechless" has the
> same effect as Godwin's but without the nasty qualifiers.

I like that explanation better then mine :)