X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,ebad838280c1dc7d X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-29 20:41:21 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!colt.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: "Tom Bampton" Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: [PIC] txt stereo gram Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 04:41:12 -0000 Lines: 86 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: edendev.demon.co.uk X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1035952875 12910 193.237.172.117 (30 Oct 2002 04:41:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 04:41:15 +0000 (UTC) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Priority: 3 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:20286 "Faux_Pseudo" wrote in message news:slrnarump4.knf.Faux_Pseudo@fugozi.cx1209071-a... > _.--- Tom Bampton spoke in alt.ascii-art --------._ > > I stuck it on the web here ... > > > > http://www.tinyirc.net/stereograms/attempt1.jpg > > That was not what it looks like at all. Not in the slightest. But it > is however very cool. When you move the layer around the sort of "gap" thing moves with it, which hurts your eyes a bit. Quite funny. > I posted the above pic to alt.binaries.misc though because you are > suffering on the bandwidth. Anyone who wants it can do a search for > the subject "stereogram ascii pic" My server's been having routing problems last couple of days, which doesnt help much in the bandwidth area :/ > I would however be curious to find out how many hits you get on that > link because I am allways curious about how many people read these > groups but never post and this is one of the best ways to approximate > that. [eden] tinyirc/logs# grep attempt1.jpg access_log | wc -l 2 So, um, that's once when i tested the link and once when you downloaded it :) But then, it hasnt been that long so :) I'll check it tommorow and see how it went. I just put up butterfly.jpg candy.jpg and karla.jpg in the same directory, but they didnt come out very well. I think perhaps I'm not understanding exactly what you meant with the method. I'll play around with it some more and see if I can get it right. Not being able to actually see the stereogram in the first place doesnt really help, though :) > > I'm not sure if I rotated too far or made the second part too large, but a > > little playing around should come up with it. > > You rotated when no rotation was needed at all. But like I said it > was stil damn cool Ahhh. I'll try again without the rotation. I think I misunderstood what you meant by tilt ... something like this? (exaggerated) ______ / \ /________\ or __________ \ / \______/ or ________ | \ | | | | |_______/ (where that's a sort of non pointy |> thing, but i am too lazy to figure out the lines) or _______ / | | | | | \_______| (again, more a non pointy <| and lazyness) And with key text, did u mean cut out everything except the words that are supposed to be there ? Whilst writing this, I did attempt2.jpg in same place, thats same as before but with no rotate. attempt3.jpg was an experiment with resizing. You might not want to look at it, it will make your eyes go extremely blurry! Mine are still messed up now and I only looked at it long enough to save it :/ T.