X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,10730325ff30b3c6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-30 02:47:36 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: bigcat@meeow.co.uk (N. Thornton) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: oooooh controversy! Date: 30 May 2002 02:47:36 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.107.229.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1022752056 10281 127.0.0.1 (30 May 2002 09:47:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 May 2002 09:47:36 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:17465 Richard James wrote in message news:... > > Been reading this a while now, like it. I have lots of goodies to > > post, but Am I going to get moaned at if I post ascii art wi colour > > codes along side the plain versions? > > And we would render this how? The black and white version would be there for you to see - so it would be ascii art, plain to see on every puter. I'd just add a colour version underneath for IRC use. I use a lot of small ascii art in IRC. Sounds harmless enough to me.... in fact, why don't I give y'all an example... I'm going to light a fire for everyone... ( . ) . .( ( ( ). ) )_(_(_ (______) colour IRC version: ( 4. ) . .( ( ( ). ) )_(_(_ 1,5(______) Thats what would get printed :) Regards, NT