X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: f996b,300a2ef6140dac11 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-02 12:08:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!212.172.2.60!not-for-mail From: Philip Newton Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Wow ansii still lives, Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 21:09:50 +0200 Organization: very little Lines: 50 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: "Philip 'Yes, that's my address' Newton" NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.172.2.60 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1020366481 13537034 212.172.2.60 (16 [11583]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:17033 On Thu, 2 May 2002 14:09:23 +0100, "Fiend" <(NOSPAM)fiend@c4.com> wrote: > I didnt think anyone still did ansii grafix, Im amazed I used to be in to it > heavily in my Amiga days on the old BBS, Over here we only do ASCII art -- "ANSIIs" also had control codes for colours, animation, cursor positioning and stuff. But the basic techniques for drawing pictures are, of course, similar. > Outlook is crap for displaying them tho, Good observation ;) > Ive messed about with a perfectly good sig so it looks ok here, but I > hope it dont look shite im your mail/news prog, It looks bad. You need to create your ASCII art in a monospace (fixed-width) font, NOT a proportional font -- then it will look similar for anyone with a fixed-width font. Look for the FAQ (look under http://groups.google.com/ , Advanced Search, newsgroup "alt.ascii-art" and subject "FAQ"; the latest version is 3.0.3.05); it has a section explaining how to use MS Outlook Express to read and write ASCII art. > | > | > .���. > { :::: } > (�`�. { ::::::: } .���) > (�`�.�(�`�.�{ } IXI { }�.���)�.���) > \ }\ `- -� /{ / > } } { { > ...Im gonna eat ya puppies... > ..and consume them like flies.. > .--------------. > |-=-> fiend@c4.com <-=-| > `--------------� That's not quite ASCII art, either, since it contains characters outside the range 32..255; the FAQ contains a list of all ASCII characters, and it's best to stick to those for maximum portability (and to be able to call it "ASCII art"). Hope this helps! Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton That really is my address; no need to remove anything to reply. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.