X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,9cdf0805fabc1a5f X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-19 08:20:07 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!diablo.theplanet.net!diablo.theplanet.net!news.theplanet.net!not-for-mail From: "Sam Blanning" Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: A giant ASCII goat Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:29:06 -0000 Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <9jod9us5u2fmhrm5knm0qvat4j0kdbfle3@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-2811.bonobo.dialup.pol.co.uk X-Trace: newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk 1016554785 21558 217.134.58.251 (19 Mar 2002 16:19:45 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Mar 2002 16:19:45 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse@theplanet.net X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:15768 "drsquare" wrote in message news:ussd9uodbmapbtm0dhr648d91ajjucv84j@4ax.com... > > [goatsex ASCII] > >> >OH, OH....the juveniles are back! > >> > >> what is it with you and juveniles? > >> > >> Why do you feel compelled to comment on every little ascii-art that you > >> don't like? > >> > >I would hardly call... well, the ASCII art is so crap I don't really know > >what's happening beyond someone displaying her insides, but I would hardly > >call that just "ascii-art I don't like". > > HIS insides. My point exactly, it's too crap to tell. In fact, I think the picture klerck posted is even more crap than the last goatsex picture that was posted. I can barely even see that someone's opening his intimate parts up.