X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9e16,50ac4d927580fd95 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public X-Google-Thread: fc9f9,50ac4d927580fd95 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc9f9,public X-Google-Thread: fcfb9,8461e7153691c525 X-Google-Attributes: gidfcfb9,public X-Google-Thread: 107d75,50ac4d927580fd95 X-Google-Attributes: gid107d75,public X-Google-Thread: f996b,50ac4d927580fd95 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-24 10:54:51 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!cyclone.socal.rr.com!cyclone3.kc.rr.com!news3.kc.rr.com!typhoon.kc.rr.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3C9E2102.7090902@mmcable.com> From: Charlie Ebert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.flame.jesus.christ,alt.seduction.fast,comp.text.tex Subject: Re: Incredible! Anti-Gravity device works and is patented 01-31-2002 References: <3C9CF5D7.7090806@mmcable.com> <3C9D03E4.9090806@mmcable.com> <3d2q9uk0fkp2vgj5nb15nacr508n22o1sv@4ax.com> <3C9D15D7.8070103@mmcable.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 37 Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:53:43 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.94.230.113 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: typhoon.kc.rr.com 1016996023 24.94.230.113 (Sun, 24 Mar 2002 12:53:43 CST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 12:53:43 CST Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:16183 comp.os.linux.advocacy:218566 alt.flame.jesus.christ:74258 alt.seduction.fast:80206 comp.text.tex:43276 . wrote: > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Robert Bowmaker wrote: > >>It doesn't 'kill' gravity - it just uses electrostatic repulsion to fight >>against it. Since 20kV of electricity are being used, I think it is likely >>that the electrostatic replusion will win. Now to finish of the argument: > > > I agree completely. The important part in this particular case is not the > argument over whether such a device can be described as "antigravity", but > rather that we have figured out a way to employ EM fields as repulsors to > *any non-ferrous material*. Further, since models of this effect can be > constructed cheaply, experimentation is now very much in the hands of laypeople > all over the world. > > We've all seen what happens when research and development is suddenly handed > to tens of thousands of independent minds through cheap materials and free > information-trade. This whole thing has alot of potential, imho. > Well, if I may. What you've just described is what happend to make Linux or FreeBSD. You will see thousands of flying apparatuses with appearently no thrust keeping them in the air and a bunch of fuck-headed EE's saying it will never work. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/03/22/2359231&mode=thread There has been no-one who has given their explaination of what they believe makes them fly. Only people who have said they can't. They same people who say Linux doesn't work say these can't fly. Charlie