X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9e16,50ac4d927580fd95 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public X-Google-Thread: fc9f9,50ac4d927580fd95 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc9f9,public X-Google-Thread: 107d75,50ac4d927580fd95 X-Google-Attributes: gid107d75,public X-Google-Thread: f996b,50ac4d927580fd95 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-Thread: fcfb9,8461e7153691c525 X-Google-Attributes: gidfcfb9,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-24 10:42:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.news.rcn.net!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!not-for-mail From: yttrx@mutilation.net (.) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.flame.jesus.christ,alt.seduction.fast,comp.text.tex Subject: Re: Incredible! Anti-Gravity device works and is patented 01-31-2002 Date: 24 Mar 2002 18:41:33 GMT Lines: 104 Sender: abbie Message-ID: References: <3C9CF5D7.7090806@mmcable.com> <3C9D03E4.9090806@mmcable.com> <3d2q9uk0fkp2vgj5nb15nacr508n22o1sv@4ax.com> <3C9D15D7.8070103@mmcable.com> X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVbL7KvaEc/RntsE9S2fj2hC3tm/6cKxwj9v6QogLdXpaY4wKcItkroa X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Mar 2002 18:41:33 GMT User-Agent: tin/1.5.11-20020124 ("Darkcell") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.3-STABLE (i386)) Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:16181 comp.os.linux.advocacy:218561 alt.flame.jesus.christ:74255 alt.seduction.fast:80204 comp.text.tex:43274 In comp.os.linux.advocacy Charlie Ebert wrote: > . wrote: >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Dr Scab wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 22:37:17 GMT, in alt.ascii-art, >>>(Charlie Ebert ) wrote: >> >> >>>>Dr Scab wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Going by that definition, a helicopter counts as an anti-gravity device. >>>>> >>>>>You really are off your head. >>>> >>>>My goodness! By your line of thinking so is the moon! >>> >> >>>The moon does not defy gravity. This new device does not defy gravity any >>>more than helicopters do. >> >> > Having read the others comments about just because it's patented doesn't > mean it works, blah, blah, blah, despite the pictures.... > I will say, shure! I've seen transister radios and the like exibiting > this kind of phenomena for years! SHURE! Just go to any park and > you'll see kids flying their high voltage UFO's all over the place. > They quit kites years ago! SHURE!!! YEAH!!! > This guy has had people all over the world repeat the experiment and > build their own. Just check out the website. > So it works. > Now that covers their comments and now I will address my freind > yttrx's comments. > I have some respect for yttrx as I've been debating with him for > years. > Yttrx! > > Even anti-gravity devices (when and if they come to fruition) will > not defy > > gravity, they will simply exemplify its properties. > > > Let me think here. To be anti would have the same meaning as exemplify > in this case wouldn't it. To neutralize! But more than neutralize, > to actually repulse as it lifts off the table. It doesn't just hover, > it can go up and down like it was climing a ladder. > But the comment about when and if they come is not necessary as the > issue is now in the past tense. The technology has been invented > and it's working. > They are reversing the effects of gravity without the aid of thrust. > There is no thrust here. Perhaps not, but there is energy which is being converted to "work", obviously. It is lifted off the table. > So, I'm trying to imagine what frame of mind your in here. > Are we in the same frame of mind or is there another angle > you're trying to represent. Expound on your notion here. What im saying is this: The thing that is being discussed here is probably not an anti-gravity device, since it is exploiting no known property of the force of gravity to achieve lift. However, this does not mean that anti-gravity devices (that which can be defined as "nullifying" or "neutralizing" or "reversing" the *force of gravity itself*) are impossible. If an anti-gravity device was somehow created, it would not "defy" gravity, logically it would simply expound on properties of the force of gravity that are either barely-or not understood at all at this point. > Gravity is a mass attraction and it's been discovered how > to neutralize the mass attraction and this has implications > for the mass production of a great many things. It sure does, which is why it is essential that it is not discounted entirely as "science fiction". Maybe we'll never come up with an actual anti-gravity device....But if we believe that it is not possible at all, we ABSOLUTELY never will. Thatd be missing out on quite alot. -----. -- end of line.