X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,54d2051df7263910 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-02 10:22:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: "Johannes 'Joey' R�ssel" Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: One character ascii-art Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 19:28:51 -0800 Organization: (none) Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1015093287 00 23354 D04tTMsVSaYi-1 020302 18:21:27 X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com X-Sender: 038100090476-0001@t-dialin.net X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:15277 > That rule has no exceptions that I know of. It just goes by pronunciation > instead of spelling. Since "urinal" is pronounced "yurinal", it's as much "a > urinal" as it is "a yak" or "a youngster" et cetera. Well, if so, I don't care. I know not one case of writing "urinal" in my whole lifetime (actually not much) so far. a yoey? no better not - Joey -- (\_ | news:de.alt.rec.ascii-art _/) _." '; __| __, ,_ __, __, .' "._ /( )h\ / | / | / | / |-----/ | (/( )\ ctr___/ \|__ \_/|_/\_/|_/ |_/\_/|_/ \_/|_/ __|/ \__