X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,7e8e4e9e5ae9b1c9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-15 15:27:26 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: bullreguard@nospam.nut (lgbeard)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: Covered Bridge
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 22:27:14 GMT
Organization: very little
Message-ID: <3d334875.1799748@news.charter.net>
References: <3d3221f5.4286974@news.charter.net>
 <38a5jug4mlvor2gou3bgtu6hcei6j5iv6m@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Lines: 13
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:18263

On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:51:25 +0200, bug <blazejk@NOSPAMkonto.pl> wrote:


>>Attempted a covered bridge again. The last one looked
>>more like an old pole barn way off on a rise.
<snip>
>
>    It would be more realistic I guess if You'd
>draw the other side  of a river, not just left. :)

Yes it would. :)

lgbeard