X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,2a9b9a13a94ffacd
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-Thread: fcfb9,2a9b9a13a94ffacd
X-Google-Attributes: gidfcfb9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-11 09:30:26 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!130.133.1.3!fu-berlin.de!server1.netnews.ja.net!pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk!ret28
From: ret28@ObviousSPAMBLOCKcam.ac.uk (Richard Thrippleton)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: The Adventures of Flatfish: Lord of the Rings special.
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 17:19:08 +0000
Organization: University of Cambridge, England
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <cq6n1a.8sk.ln@pi>
References: <nesr3uohctam0k3tpv3a0squt1cgl1hb6a@4ax.com>
 <slrna3s8gg.d6.tjporter@gronk.porter.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pi.chu.cam.ac.uk
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.2 (Linux)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:171861 alt.ascii-art:13642

In article <slrna3s8gg.d6.tjporter@gronk.porter.net>, Terry Porter wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 20:31:17 +0000 (UTC), drsquare in article
> <nesr3uohctam0k3tpv3a0squt1cgl1hb6a@4ax.com> dashed off:
>>The Adventures of Flatfish: Lord of the Rings special.
>>
>>Best viewed in font:
>>-misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-iso8859-1 
>>or fixedsys.
>>Best viewed with black text on a light grey background, but can also be
>>viewed with any light-on-dark combination. Must not be viewed with light on
>>dark, as many things will look wrong.
>>If you are using a non-fixed-width font, then you will be miserable for the
>>rest of the episode. 
>>Make sure your window is wider than 80 characters (we don't want any
>>wrapping).
>>
>>
>>
>>Part 1: THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE ACTIVATION CODE 
>
>
><big snip>
>
>Another excellent cartoon from the master of Cola cartoons, DrSquare!
>
>You've a lot of tallent Drsquare, and unless anyone objects, I'm appointing
>you "Official Cola Cartoonist in Residence" :)
>
>Personally I think you had enough material for several episodes there, and
>should have released it in little pieces.
	Terry, did you get some lines of it wrapping around viewing in slrn?
'cos I did(and use slrn), and am wondering why.

Richard
-- 
My .sig blatant plug
http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~ret28