X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,f14d7f1522a35b66 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-26 18:15:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!hub1.nntpserver.com!news-out.spamkiller.net!propagator-la!news-in-la.newsfeeds.com!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!165.113.238.17!pln-w!extra.newsguy.com!lotsanews.com!sjc1.nntp.concentric.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!global-news-master From: mikechat.remove@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Bowl of Cheerios Date: 27 Jan 2002 02:15:16 GMT Organization: Concentric Internet Services Lines: 28 Message-ID: <3c536268.1870399@205.158.27.245> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.220.177.92 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243 Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:14104 On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 19:09:15 +0000 (UTC), drsquare wrote: >On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 09:47:12 +0400, in alt.ascii-art, > ("Poster" ) wrote: > >>> I didn't say I disliked them totally, but disliked them for using a >>program >>> that does things for them. >> >>why even bother having a PC...after all it is those mini electronics >>that do a lot of work for the person. > >The PC doesn't do ASCII art for people. These programs do the art for >people. which program would that be? > >>Afterall, if these gadgets were >>not there, there would have been no automation programs. How about each >>person trying to write their own Compiler, then write their own O/S and >>then write their own Text editor and then..... > >That doesn't make any sense at all. > you missed the point,,, again.