X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4f17,15af5515548b5f51 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4f17,public X-Google-Thread: fc9f9,15af5515548b5f51 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc9f9,public X-Google-Thread: fe7ce,15af5515548b5f51 X-Google-Attributes: gidfe7ce,public X-Google-Thread: f996b,15af5515548b5f51 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-Thread: fcfb9,15af5515548b5f51 X-Google-Attributes: gidfcfb9,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-30 16:20:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!btnet-peer1!btnet-peer0!btnet-feed5!btnet!news.btopenworld.com!mark From: mark@NOHAM.otford.kent.btinternet.co.uk (Mark Kent) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.politics.socialism,alt.seduction.fast,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: What does everyone reckon our chances are for the Euro 2004 qualifying? Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:19:26 +0000 (UTC) Organization: BT Openworld Lines: 55 Message-ID: <0g2a3a.g2p.ln@192.168.1.1> References: <3c55c27f$0$251$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk> <3c55c608$0$4617$626a54ce@news.free.fr> <3c56e685$0$206$626a54ce@news.free.fr> <3c57cfd0.3518600@news.dial.pipex.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.7.55.77 X-Trace: knossos.btinternet.com 1012436366 13017 62.7.55.77 (31 Jan 2002 00:19:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news-complaints@lists.btinternet.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:19:26 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.2 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:14286 alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian:35457 alt.politics.socialism:15048 alt.seduction.fast:74661 comp.os.linux.advocacy:184321 Mart van de Wege espoused: >On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:58:56 +0100, brokenbroker@ytp.net wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:20:47 GMT, FinaliDentity wrote: >> >>>"Mirak" wrote in >>>news:3c56e685$0$206$626a54ce@news.free.fr: >>> >>>> All taht you say is that france is lucky because they are the first >>>> team to win a world cup and a euro in a row ? AHAHAHAHAHAH Is it luck >>>> to lose only 3-2 against holland with bench players ? >>>> >>>> >>>Let's see, Holland, so "great" a footballing power that ... >>> >>>THEY DIDN'T QUALIFY FOR THE WORLD CUP???!!! Geez, you'd think you could >>>come up with a better example than THAT! :) >> >> Don't you think it's weird that Holland didn't qualify? Perhaps they >> have too many stars which therefore splits the team. When playing their >> best, many believe (incl. me) Holland to be about the best. It's their >> team spirit/sum of egos that's their problem. >> > > >Ok, one off-topic x-post and I'll shut up. Apologies to all. > >The problem with dutch teams, the national side included, is *mentality*. >We dutch fans, and by extension the coaches and players, like a carefully >structured, tactically intelligent passing game. For this you need a team >with good players (check), a smart coach (check) and good form (always a >variable). > >The ego problem of too many stars and no team exists, but the major >problem is bad form. When the form isn't there, the team can't play its >favourite game, so then it would be time to just go in there and *fight* >for every mm of grass. Unfortunately, we don't have the players with the >right sort of mentality for that style, like the germans and the english. >In fact, teams and players that are able and willing to employ this style >of play are roundly boo-ed by both press and public. Only one major team >in our league has this as its 'house style', and unsurprisingly, it is >widely regarded as an 'ugly' team (Feyenoord Rotterdam). > >Therefore, on good form, the Netherlands can beat anyone, on bad form they >in turn can be beaten by everyone. > Netherlands are always a team to treat with caution and respect. Seem to fall down on penalty shoot-outs, though. Presumably Van Nistelroiy will be key part of next team? -- Mark Kent Take out the ham to mail me.