X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,7ca8f6640003d148 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-23 12:52:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news-x2.support.nl!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!ctb-nntp1.saix.net!not-for-mail From: Lord Vader Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: profiles Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 22:51:57 +0200 Organization: Join me! Lines: 41 Message-ID: References: <8m165a.ih6.ln@rander.dk> <5lod7u8qgia24d5fvj3ugqj080f83762la@4ax.com> <238f7u491qs9g5a52k0b2mc4tjatav9bqv@4ax.com> <2srf7ukhqhg9l1cu9afviucbkha70k1gg6@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: slip232.new.co.za Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ctb-nnrp1.saix.net 1014497519 12296 196.25.206.98 (23 Feb 2002 20:51:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@saix.net NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Feb 2002 20:51:59 GMT X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.9/32.560 Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:14932 On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:01:14 +0000 (UTC), drsquare wrote in message <2srf7ukhqhg9l1cu9afviucbkha70k1gg6@4ax.com>: >On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 16:02:32 +0200, in alt.ascii-art, > (Lord Vader ) wrote: >>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:03:49 +0000 (UTC), drsquare >>wrote in message : >>>Or Opera with the images turned off, or Netscape with javascript turned >>>off, or IE with java turned off, or IE when it's putting pink stripes >>>across images, >>i'm not interested in people who screw their browser settings up... >No, those are perfectly legitimate browser settings. no, they're not... nobody turns off picture display except the clueless... >>>or an old browser that doesn't understand certain tags, >>not a proper browser then... >Of course it is. If you're using non-standard specialised tags, you can >have no complaints about your site rendering incorrectly. I use HTML 4.0... >>only the latest version of a browser is a "proper" one... >That shows how much you know about HTML. I know it very well indeed as a matter of fact... and I use a minimal subset... certainly frames are out of the question...! >>>or someone viewing in 4-bit colour etc etc etc... >>i don't give a fuck what the idiots have done to fuck their PCs up... >They've fucked up their PCs because they don't render your non-standard, >fucked-up website? I supose your idea of a good web site is 500MB of java. my idea of a great web site is minimal graphics and PHP scripting... the less javascript the better... and no java at all... my site is 1.4MB and you can view it here: http://www.adderleystreet.co.za -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php