X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,1e18a57c8411bbc9,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-24 18:13:32 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!west.cox.net!cox.net!p01!news2.west.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art From: Faux_Pseudo Subject: [pic] from another group. Reply-To: Faux_Pseudo@yahoo.comERCIAL X-Why: are you reading this X-PGP-KeyID: CF4DA06B Message-ID: User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Lines: 78 Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 01:13:30 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.8.9.87 X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net X-Trace: news2.west.cox.net 1030238010 68.8.9.87 (Sat, 24 Aug 2002 21:13:30 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 21:13:30 EDT Organization: Cox Communications Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:19143 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --<-(John Leonard eipe tous logous autous emin eis sci.anthropology)->-- > Group, > > Although I'm sure its in the works, a family tree showing the evolution > of human beings would probably be interesting. Very. > I expect that it would > confirm, as well as upset, a great many suspicions and prejudices. If you mean racists by prejudices then I eagerly await its arrival. But they will be upset. They wont change their mind. > Ultimately, one will have to be produced if science is to continue to > progress. . i i . \ \_|_|_/ / \/ \/ \O O/ c| v |c | _ | |/"\| || || || || || || Faux_Pseudo's Jaw hitting ||o|| table in acme style ascii-vision || || || || :F_P: __//. .\\__ -------/ /": i :"\ \--------- \_/HHHHHHH\_/ \_________/ Do you have any idea what the hell you are talking about? This is /science/ we are dealing with here. Let me rephrase that key word here for you. -= o8888o o888o oo o888o o8o88o o888o o888o 88___ 88 88 88 88___88 88 88 88 88 88___88 " 8o 88 __ 88 88 __ 88 88 88 __ 88 __ 88oo88" "8oo88" 88o"8oo88" 88 88 "8oo88" "8oo88" Funny word that is. It means using things where we use things like the "Scientific Method". And in that we observe first and then work out how things function. The way you phrased that it is that we can not know how things function until we know the whole layout of the tree. Science does not work that way. First we find out how all the little parts work together and fit in this gig-saw puzzle of a universe and then we we put it together exactly because we don't have that big nice 4 color glossy picture to guide us. So each piece must be worked on individually till we figure out the whole thing. Not the other way around. ==)-> Kataleipw, Faux_Pseudo - -- .-')) _ UIN= 66618055 _ (('-. | It's a damn poor mind that ' ..- .:" ) ( ":. -.. ' | can only think of one way to ((,,_;'.;' ';. ';_,,)) | spell a word. ((_.;'*Faux_Pseudo*':._)) | - Andrew Jackson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9aC00kjt2bc9NoGsRAjs0AJ4vQfGkUGb+Y/0dqoye66inJTCZWQCaAgzQ Lb8kWCUuVAfuUsze85Qi/n4= =8OUe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----