X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,fd2a2aeac2fccacf X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-18 21:58:15 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: nope@nospam.nut (LGB) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Modified FAQ for rec.arts.ascii Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 04:56:30 GMT Organization: very little.net Message-ID: <3cbf9186.4073362@news.charter.net> References: <3cbf62eb.30581445@205.158.27.245> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Lines: 71 Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:16897 On 19 Apr 2002 01:21:00 GMT, mikechat.remove@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote: >On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 01:51:12 +0200, Andreas Freise wrote: > >>On 17 Apr 2002 Graham Drabble wrote: >>> As part of the revitalising of rec.arts.ascii I have gone throught the >>> alt.ascii-art FAQ and made some changes to customise it for posting to >>> rec.arts.ascii. It is posted below and you are encouraged to read it >>> and comment. I am particuarly looking for someone to re-do my >>> rec.arts.ascii at the begining. >> Why ? Redo it ? No. Ool an VK put in alot of work into the picture. Why not create something new with the particpants from the group as it gets going. >>[snip] >> >>It wrapped. And I don't quite like what you are doing there. It >>actually is the FAQ for a.a-a and should stay just that. Of course someone >>should add pointers for the new group (probably Colin, since he has >>been working on that thing for a while now). And of course it may be >>posted to r.a.a but I don't see any good reason for changing >>a.a-a to r.a.a in the text. I get the same feeling it is not quite right. >> >>If you want some advertising, good. But don't try to force people >>and action to move from a.a-a to r.a.a. Either that will happen or it >>won't. _I_ for example am rather addicted to _this_ little place >>in Usenet. :) >> A strange, wried, wonderful, place :) > >Maybe a FAQ about how the moderation works, and why it is done that >way, with links to the ASCII Art FAQ site(s) or include the a.a-a >FAQ under the r.a.a > > ____ _____ ____ > _..._ | _ \| ____/ ___| // > ,' `. | |_) | _|| | /X// _ > / \ | _ <| |__| |___ _ (\ //-'// > \`-'\`-'/`/ |_| \_\_____\____(_) / \)---' > `. ; ;.' _ ____ ____ ___ ___ /X// > `.;,' / \ / ___| / ___|_ _|_ _| > \O/ / _ \ \___ \| | | | | | > () / ___ \ ___) | |___ | | | | _ > >> /_/ \_\____/ \____|___|___(_) > _ ____ _____ > / \ | _ \_ _| \O/ > / _ \ | |_) || | ()] > / ___ \| _ < | | || __ > /_/ \_\_| \_\|_| .'"|: .' /; > __......____...---.._ ~O/ : `: / ' > ..--"" .----`. [()\; :/ / > | : : />.' =; / > __________`-----.'---.----' ; .' > .' .' >__ ___ ___..' -' > `---------------._.------''' """ MJP > There is a start. >What is rec.ascii.art > > >How do I post to r.a.a The FAQ does not inform you how to. lgbeard