X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,faeac71562bfe753 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-01 02:12:27 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsmi-us.news.garr.it!newsmi-eu.news.garr.it!NewsITBone-GARR!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!user14686.vip-za.COM!not-for-mail From: b Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Still would like a Gecko! Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 12:12:26 +0200 Organization: Cuneiform Script Writers Guild Lines: 120 Message-ID: References: <7tseauc66419ld8i3bg300bf19570u79vj@4ax.com> <3ca7a962.32560011@205.158.27.245> NNTP-Posting-Host: user14686.vip-za.com (163.203.153.94) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1017655944 27737359 163.203.153.94 (16 [138478]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564 Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:16490 On 01 Apr 2002 00:34:06 GMT, mikechat.remove@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote in message <3ca7a962.32560011@205.158.27.245>: >On Mon, 01 Apr 2002 01:12:12 +0200, b wrote: >>On Sun, 31 Mar 2002 16:57:40 +0200, "Andrea Lachner" >> wrote in message >>: >>>Considering I am the reason all this started, I have ONLY one thing to >>>say: >>>b (alias Richard) >>>is pathetically overreacting, and seeking attention. Shame! >>>Has he got any siblings? Obviously none he cares about! >>>Because if he did, and someone made a derrogatory comment about his >>>siblings, he would also react like my brother did! >>>IDIOT, is all I have to say! >>>And, oh so very boring! >>I did not know that you were related... there must be plenty of people who >>share your surname... >>secondly, i was merely having some harmless fun that I am sure did not >>offend you... >lets see, if _they_ weren't offended, why are you being so whinie any complaint is a whine in your view... i've had my inbox flooded, been signed up for third part subscriptions, had my name and email address forged (and received complaints for stuff that Copeman is doing), had my personal particulars posted all over Usenet and various web sites, received death threats etc. etc... and all because one particular person (Peter Copeman) could not get his way and have my ISP revoke my account for participating on ATJ... because he apparently does not want people exchanging conversation there... he insists that ATJ is for joke lists only... i told him to take a hike and he went nuts... he even started posting here, which of course annie_ascii loved... in fact "she" only posts now to scoff at me because I outed "her" on here... only a very few people still believe she is a 15yo girl... and "she" takes great delight in re-posting my personal details here, but no one rebukes her for that... if people are going to hold me accountable for posting Gernot's details here, then I am going to hold anyone who posts my details legally accountable too... and don't accuse me of whining further either... Copeman is still waging war on news:alt.tasteless.jokes and while I was his number one target, all the rest, including Gernot Lachner here, thought it hilarious to incite him to new heights, and I was the one who suffered... now that it is their turn, they are all of a sudden producing email addresses where abuse reports may be sent and taking it all very seriously... one Australian is even using his postion to intimidate the staff at an anonymous service to reveal the identity of the person signing him up for third party subscriptions... >>thirdly, that phrase (show us yer tits) is commonly used by other people on >>Usenet without Gernot jumping on them and being personally abusive towards >>them... >the phrase "show us yer tits" is abusive, and a personal affront to those you use it on no, it's not... it's clearly a joke... and I intended it as a joke... none of my posts are intended to cause people personal hurt or otherwise inconvenience them... >>Gernot clearly has a personal problem with me, because it is not what I say >>but the mere fact that it emanates from _me_ that causes his reaction... >not only Gernot, but the whole world, even the voices have turned against you fine, be silly about it... it's not really your problem anyway... and fyi i do not suffer auditory hallucinations... >>I am not prepared to tolerate his abuse anymore... furthermore I find it >you seem eager to dish out what you cannot take that is ridiculous... i am not an abusive poster... >>ironic in the extreme that he whines that I breached his privacy by posting >no the irony is the amount of whining you are doing when its YOUR turn on the hotseat actually the irony is that Gernot Lachner has actively encouraged a hardcore Internet abuser merely because he doesn't like me... I ignore those I dislike... I don't play petty revenge games on the Internet... after all, this is a place I work too... >>his personal details (that he accidentally posted elsewhere) when he has >>actively incited Peter Copeman when he decided to post by personal details >you feel no compunction against doing it to others, just if it happens to you nonsense... I have posted only Gernot's address on here to indicate to him that he is not anonymous... and that I am entirely serious about him showing me respect or just refraining from issuing further slanderous and false comments online about me... >>online... Gernot's incitement of Peter Copeman including condenation of >>Copemans' death threats against me, when Copeman was posting a physical >>address that could well have been accurate... at no time did Gernot oppose >>such death threats, in fact he encouraged Copeman... I hold Gernot complicit >>in this ongoing abuse against me and I am ready to pursue criminal and civil >>actions against him if he refuses to take me seriously and stop... >maybe, just maybe, if you stopped your crap, the crap you dish out wouldn't come back around and >smack you in the back of the head later utter rubbish... this happened as a result of Copeman's implacable desire to force his will on atj... Gernot took a dislike to me for his own reasons... I cannot account for that... disliking someone is a private issue, slandering and harassing them because of that dislike is a completely different matter... Now I suggest you not involve yourself any further in something you do not understand fully... you are not in full possession of the facts and I don't think you are particularly interested in doing anything but add more fuel to the fire... -- beside.myself@last.com V ybir lbh nyy. Lbh ner nyy fhpu fcrpvny crbcyr. Naq abj V unir gb xvyy lbh.