X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,a0b413acda56e8dd X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-09 08:09:57 PST Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 11:09:39 -0400 From: Eric Sherman X-X-Sender: doubtful@reagan.hostnoc.net Subject: Re: [info] alt.ascii-art FAQ v3.0.3.05 (draft) In-Reply-To: <16e613ec.0204090613.43cec67a@posting.google.com> Message-ID: References: <16e613ec.0204090613.43cec67a@posting.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Lines: 15 Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!hub1.nntpserver.com!news.nntpserver.com Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:16753 On 9 Apr 2002, Jorn Barger wrote: > Aren't 99% of readers going to be confused by this, since the Windows > default is dark-on-light? (I suggest switching 'Darker' and 'Lighter'.) they don't count. they don't like ascii. besides, a microsoft os hasn't been shipped with monospaced fonts since windows for workgroups. -eric -- Eric Sherman eric.sherman@doubtful.com Doubtful www.doubtful.com